Abstract:Single crystal elastic constants of Ti–Ni alloys without (quenched) and with (aged) Ti3Ni4 precipitates were measured systematically by rectangular parallelepiped resonance method as a function of composition and temperature, and compared with Ti–Ni–Cu and Ti–Ni–Fe alloys, in an attempt to answer some long-standing questions as to the origin of the unique monoclinic B19′ martensite, and why composition and thermomechanical treatment greatly changes the path of martensitic transformation. The results showed that softening in c44, in additional to c′, is a common feature for all Ti–Ni binary (both quenched or aged) and ternary alloys. This general feature just corresponds to the fact that all these alloys ultimately transform into B19′, suggesting that softening in c44 is responsible for the unique B19′ martensite, which found no analogy in other β phase alloys. We also found an interesting correspondence between the temperature dependence of anisotropy factor and transformation path. Prior to B2–B19′ transformation anisotropy shows a decrease with lowering temperature; prior to B2–B19 an anisotropy increase, while prior to B2–R transformation a constant anisotropy. We further showed that three possible martensite candidates (R, B19, B19′) are rooted in anomalies in specific phonon modes and elastic softening. We showed that the multi-stage transformations are restricted by a general rule: multi-stage transformation occurs in the sequence of increasing transformation strain. With this rule we can explain all known transformation paths by considering the effect of alloying addition and fine precipitates/dislocation network on relative stability of different martensites. We further predict that there may exist a new transformation path in Ti–Ni-based alloys: B2–R–B19–B19′.

Origin of an Isothermal R-martensite Formation in Ni-rich Ti-Ni Solid Solution: Crystallization of Strain Glass.

Stress-induced Strain Glass to Martensite (R) Transition in a Ti50Ni44.5…

Spontaneous Strain Glass to Martensite Transition in A Ti50ni44.5fe5.5 Strain Glass

Spontaneous strain glass to martensite transition in a Ti 50 Ni

Phase Diagram Ofti50−xni50+x: Crossover from Martensite to Strain Glass

Reentrant strain glass transition in Ti-Ni-Cu shape memory alloy

Strain glass in Fe-doped Ti–Ni

Strain Glass in Ti50−xNi35+xCu15 Shape Memory Alloys

NMR study of Ni50+xTi50-x Strain-Glass

High-temperature Near-Equiatomic TiNi Strain Glass

Temperature–stress phase diagram of strain glass Ti48.5Ni51.5

Heterogeneities and Strain Glass Behavior: Role of Nanoscale Precipitates in Low-Temperature-Aged Ti48.7ni51.3 Alloys

High Temperature Strain Glass in Ti50(Pd50−xCrx) Alloy and the Associated Shape Memory Effect and Superelasticity

Nanoscaled Martensitic Domains in Ferroelastic Systems: Strain Glass

Strain glass in doped Ti50(Ni50−xDx) (D = Co, Cr, Mn) alloys: Implication for the generality of strain glass in defect-containing ferroelastic systems

Insitu Study Of Phase-Transformations In A 50.8 At-Percent Ni-Ti Alloy

Spontaneous Strain Glass to Martensite Transition in Ferromagnetic Ni-Co-Mn-Ga Strain Glass

Dislocation Induced Strain Glass in Ti50Ni45Fe5 Alloy

Stress-induced reverse martensitic transformation in a Ti-51Ni (at%) alloy aged under uniaxial stress

A Comparative Study of Elastic Constants of Ti–Ni-based Alloys Prior to Martensitic Transformation

Strain Glass State As the Boundary of Two Phase Transitions