Abstract:Abstract Background and objectives: Motivated from a study on breast cancer, we consider the problem of evaluating a statistical hypothesis when some model characteristics are potentially non or weakly identifiable from observed data. Such scenarios are common in longitudinal studies for evaluating a covariate effect when dropouts may be informative. The hypothesis related to treatment effects may not be testable nonparametrically, with untestable model restrictions necessary for inference. A popular approach is to assume a finite dimensional model and to fix a minimal set of parameters, called sensitivity parameters, conditional upon which hypothesized parameters are assumed identifiable. These profile models, viewed as a functional of the secondary or sensitivity parameters, form the basis of sensitivity analysis. In the current literature, however, inference regarding significance of the covariates is ad hoc, ignoring that multiple tests are conducted and that the working model may be misspecified. Methods and results: In this paper, we propose conservatively testing the null hypothesis of interest across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic. The test must account for the facts that inferences are carried out simultaneously across the entire range of the sensitivity parameters and that the model may be misspecified under certain values of the sensitivity parameters, as might occur if a nonignorable model is fit, when, in reality, missingness is ignorable. We characterize the limiting distribution of the statistic as a functional of processes in the sensitivity parameters, which involves a careful theoretical analysis of its behavior under model misspecification. In practice, we suggest a simple yet flexible resampling procedure to implement the infimum test as well as to construct confidence bands for simultaneous pointwise tests across all values of the sensitivity parameters. The methodology's practical utility is illustrated in simulations and an analysis of quality-of-life outcomes from a longitudinal study on breast cancer. Interestingly in this example, a covariate effect on cancer outcomes is detected over a wide range of the sensitivity parameter when a Wald test that assumes identifiability fails. Implications and next steps: The key implication of this work is that the hypothesis of interest can be conservatively evaluated across the support of the sensitivity parameters using an infimum test statistic over the space of these parameters. A key assumption of this paper is that the working model is finite dimensional although the full specification of distribution of the data is not required. The methodology should be broadly applicable to infinite dimensional models, such as survival models for censored data. This extension is the focus of current research work. Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20(10 Suppl):A6.

On 'efficient Statistical Tests to Compare Youden Index: Accounting for Contingency Correlation'

Statistical inference for diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple comparisons

Youden index estimation based on group-tested data

Accurate inference for the Youden index and its associated cutoff point based on the gamma and inverse Gaussian distributed assumption

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Testing the equality of response rate functions for paired binary data with multiple groups

Robust posterior inference for Youden's index cutoff

A model-free estimation for the covariate-adjusted Youden index and its associated cut-point

An Adaptive-to-Model Test for Parametric Single-Index Errors-in-Variables Models

A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size

Abstract A6: A Global Sensitivity Test for Evaluating Hypotheses with Non- and Weakly Identifiable Statistical Models: an Application to Breast Cancer Outcomes

Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs

Joint Statistical Inference for the Area under the ROC Curve and Youden Index under a Density Ratio Model

Two Indexes for Comparison of Model Prediction Effect and Their Com-putation in R

A Dunnett-Type Test and Its Sample Size Calculation for Comparing K ROC Curves with a Control

Smoothed Jackknife Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Difference of ROC Curves

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

Efficiency Comparison of New Adjusted Nonparametric and Parametric Statistics Interval Estimation Methods in the Simple Linear Regression Model

Optimal exact tests for multiple binary endpoints

Statistical Tests for Proportion Difference in One-to-Two Matched Binary Diagnostic Data: Application to Environmental Testing of Salmonella in the United States

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions