A randomised, parallel-group comparison study of diquafosol ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye in China and Singapore.

Lan Gong,Xinghuai Sun,Zhizhong Ma,Qinmei Wang,Xun Xu,Xiaoming Chen,Yan Shao,Ke Yao,Luosheng Tang,Yangshun Gu,Huiping Yuan,Wei Han Chua,Jacob Cheng Yen Chuan,Louis Tong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306084
2015-01-01
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:Aims To compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye in China and Singapore. Methods A total of 497 patients with dry eye (Schirmer's test, 5 mm; fluorescein and RB score, 3 points) from China and Singapore were randomised to receive either diquafosol ophthalmic solution (diquafosol) or sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (HA) at 1:1 ratio. The fluorescein staining scores and rose bengal (RB) subjective symptom scores and tear film breakup time were evaluated before treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after start of treatment. Results In the diquafosol group, changes in fluorescein and RB scores compared with baseline at week 4 or at the time of discontinuation were -2.1 +/- 1.5 and -2.5 +/- 2.0, respectively. Compared with the HA group, changes in fluorescein score were non-inferior and changes in RB score were superior (p=0.019). In addition, diquafosol and HA improved tear film breakup time by 1.046 +/- 1.797 and 0.832 +/- 1.775 s, respectively (no significant intergroup difference). Adverse event onset rates were 16.3% (40 of 246 subjects) and 10.0% (25 of 251 subjects) in the diquafosol group and HA group, respectively, with borderline significant intergroup differences (p=0.046), while adverse drug reaction incidence rates were 12.2% (30 of 246 subjects) and 6.0% (15 of 251 subjects), respectively (p=0.019). Only mild adverse drug reactions (>2%) in the form of eye discharge, itching or irritation were observed. Conclusions Diquafosol improved fluorescein staining score in a manner similar to HA, and significantly improved RB score compared with HA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?