Overall Survival of Primary Single Intracranial Atypical Meningioma with Different Surgical and Postoperative Treatment Options: Evidence from the SEER Database
Jia-Jun Qin,Chao Li,Jin Fu,Xian-Zhen Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s461450
2024-05-28
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Jia-Jun Qin, &ast Chao Li, &ast Jin Fu, Xian-Zhen Chen Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Xian-Zhen Chen; Jin Fu, Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 301, Yanchang Middle Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China, Tel +8613901793331 ; +86 13262727292, Email ; Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of different surgical and postoperative treatment options on the long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with primary single intracranial atypical meningioma. Methods: In this retrospective study, participants were drawn from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who underwent either gross total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection (STR). The inverse probability weighting (IPW) method using generalized boosted models was used to achieve balance in variables across various treatment groups. Subsequent to IPW, multivariate Cox analysis and Kaplan–Meier analysis were conducted, with OS as the endpoint. Results: GTR was conducted on 1650 patients, while STR was conducted on 1109 patients. Among these, 432 patients who underwent GTR and 401 patients who underwent STR received postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). In the case of patients who were under 60 years old, PORT emerged as a significant protective factor for OS in those who underwent STR (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23– 0.84; p = 0.013). Survival curves demonstrated that patients who underwent STR with PORT exhibited comparable OS to those who underwent GTR without PORT (p = 0.546). Conversely, for patients aged 60 years or older, PORT emerged as an independent risk factor for both GTR (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.00– 2.00; p = 0.048) and STR (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.26– 2.60; p = 0.001). Conclusion: PORT may contribute to improving OS in primary single atypical meningioma patients under 60 years old who receive STR. However, in older patients who underwent either GTR or STR, the administration of PORT may be associated with a potential risk of OS. Therefore, age should be taken into account in applying PORT therapy, and the optimal treatment strategy for PORT in patients with atypical meningiomas needs to be further explored and validated. Keywords: age, atypical meningioma, gross total resection, postoperative radiotherapy, subtotal resection Meningiomas are the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, 1 with the predominant subtype among WHO Grade II meningiomas being atypical meningioma (AM). 2 Surgical intervention is the preferred treatment approach for symptomatic or progressively enlarging meningiomas, 3,4 with a primary focus on achieving Simpson Grade I resection. 5 However, attaining Simpson Grade I resection is not universally feasible for all patients, due to variables such as the anatomical position, size, and other factors of the tumor. 6 In contemporary neurosurgical practices, resections categorized as Simpson Grade I–III are classified as Gross Total Resection (GTR), while Grades IV–V fall under Subtotal Resection (STR). 7,8 Despite the endorsement of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with AM post-surgery by the 2016 and 2021 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines, particularly for those undergoing STR, the effectiveness of PORT in enhancing patient outcomes remains uncertain. 3,4 The impact of PORT on survival, as evidenced by existing retrospective studies, remains a topic of contention. While some studies propose that PORT enhances both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in post-surgical patients, irrespective of whether they underwent GTR or STR, 9–12 conflicting conclusions are presented by other investigations. 13–16 Additionally, conflicting findings exist regarding the extent of resection (EOR) when examining the impact of PORT in patients with AM who underwent either GTR or STR. 9,11,12,14,16–20 Hence, in this population-based study, we seek to assess the role of PORT in a substantial group of patients diagnosed with AM, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with approval from the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (Approval number:SHSY-LYZX-202). In conducting this study, the SEER database, a publicly accessible resource, was utilized. All participants selected for our r -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services