Differences in alternative splicing and their potential underlying factors between animals and plants
Yunfei Du,Lu Cao,Shuo Wang,Liangyu Guo,Lingling Tan,Hua Liu,Ying Feng,Wenwu Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2023.11.017
IF: 12.822
2023-11-22
Journal of Advanced Research
Abstract:Highlights • AS dysregulation is involved in a vast repertoire of diseases, including many cancers. • AS is important for reprogramming stress-related genes in response to abiotic stresses. • Divergence in intron, UTR, and exon confers gene architecture differences in animals and plants. • Members (e.g. U2AF) of spliceosome components evolved differently in animals and plants. • The main AS mode is exon skipping in animals versus intron retention in plants. • Compared to plants, animals have a greater diversity of hnRNPs but fewer SR proteins. Background Alternative splicing (AS), a posttranscriptional process, contributes to the complexity of transcripts from a limited number of genes in a genome, and AS is considered a great source of genetic and phenotypic diversity in eukaryotes. In animals, AS is tightly regulated during the processes of cell growth and differentiation, and its dysregulation is involved in many diseases, including cancers. Likewise, in plants, AS occurs in all stages of plant growth and development, and it seems to play important roles in the rapid reprogramming of genes in response to environmental stressors. To date, the prevalence and functional roles of AS have been extensively reviewed in animals and plants. However, AS differences between animals and plants, especially their underlying molecular mechanisms and impact factors, are anecdotal and rarely reviewed. Aim of Review This review aims to broaden our understanding of AS roles in a variety of biological processes and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms and impact factors likely leading to AS differences between animals and plants. Key scientific concepts of review We briefly summarize the roles of AS regulation in physiological and biochemical activities in animals and plants. Then, we underline the differences in the process of AS between plants and animals and especially analyze the potential impact factors, such as gene exon/intron architecture, 5'/3' untranslated regions (UTRs), spliceosome components, chromatin dynamics and transcription speeds, splicing factors [serine/arginine-rich (SR) proteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs)], noncoding RNAs, and environmental stimuli, which might lead to the differences. Moreover, we compare the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD)-mediated turnover of the transcripts with a premature termination codon (PTC) in animals and plants. Finally, we summarize the current AS knowledge published in animals versus plants and discuss the potential development of disease therapies and superior crops in the future. Graphical abstract Download : Download high-res image (179KB) Download : Download full-size image
multidisciplinary sciences