Comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in assessing radiofrequency ablation margins after radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas.
Jin-rong Qu,Cui-cui Liu,Hong-kai Zhang,Xiang Li,Jian-wei Zhang,Jun-peng Luo,Nan-nan Shao,Shou-ning Zhang,Yan-le Li,Hai-Liang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2012.05.008
2012-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To assess the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the follow-up of patients with hepatocellular carcinomas treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and to compare it with that of computed tomography (CT).
METHODS:From December 2009 to September 2011, 40 patients (47 hepatocellular carcinomas) were treated with RFA after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and underwent MRI and CT for follow-up. RFA margins were assessed on a five-point scale with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were evaluated.
RESULTS:The interobserver agreement rate for MRI was significantly higher (Kappa=0.935) than for CT (Kappa=0.714; P < 0.05). The scores of 1 and 5 points for MRI, which confirms the presence or absence of residual tumor, accounted for 89.4% (84/94), while for CT accounting for only 31.9% (30/94). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MRI was significantly higher than that of CT (P < 0.05), as were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of detection rate (mean, 100%, 96.4%, 76.9%, 100%, and 96.8% for MRI, respectively, vs. 30.0%, 57.1%, 10.3%, 87.7%, and 63.8% for CT).
CONCLUSION:MRI is superior to CT in assessing the RFA margins in terms of the diagnostic accuracy and detection rate .