Abstract:Objective; The present investigation was designed to evaluate the regenerating effects of chip bone grafts harvested from implant drilling and biomaterials with or without combined application of guided bone regeneration (GBR) for the augmentation of peri-implant bone defects. Materials and methods; Four mongrel dogs were used. After the mandibular premolars were extracted for 12 weeks, surgical implantation of 4 titanium implants was performed on each side of the mandible. Chip bone was collected during the drilling procedure. Three-wall bone defects, about 2 mm high, 2 mm wide, and 3 mm long, were created at the buccal side of each implant. The osteotomy sites were separately filled with autogenous chip bone, Bio-oss mineral bone or mixture of both except one defect was left empty. The operation areas of the left mandibula were covered with titanium membranes. The right mandibles without membrane were used as controls. The dogs were sacrificed at either 9 or 16 weeks after the second operation. After the specimens containing experimental implants were resected, the resorption amount of the bone graft was measured. Then the specimens were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained with methylene blue and alkalescence fuchsin. Histological examination was performed and photographs were taken under photomicroscope. Results; The mean vertical distances of each bone defects were 2.64±0.17 mm in the D1 (control) group, 1.81± 0.21 mm in D2 (autograft) group, 1.72±0.34 mm in D3 (Bio-oss) group, 1.51±0.22 mm in D4 (mixture) group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that there was significant difference between the results of D1 and the results of other three groups (p<0.01). No statistical differences were revealed between autograft group and Bio-oss group, as well as Bio-oss group and mixture group. It is confirmed there was significant difference between autograft group and mixture group (p<0.05). Histological observations revealed both quantity and quality of regenerated bone in the mixture grafted specimens were superior to that of single Bio-oss grafted or single autologous bone grafted specimens.Whether the membranes were utilized or not, vertical distances of the defects were larger at 16 weeks than those at 9 weeks in all the groups. Bone grafts with titanium membranes were subjected to greater resorption than those without membrane coverings at either 9 weeks or 16 weeks. Statistical analysis indicated there were significant differences in the results between the two groups (p<0.01). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrated the utilization of bone chip collected during implant drilling in combination with biomaterial was a feasible methods for repairing the limited bone defect around the implant. Using the mixture of autogenous bone and Bio-oss mineral as grafting material may significantly promote the bone regenerating effects. The functions of titanium membrane need to be further investigated.

Evaluations of guided bone regeneration in canine radius segmental defects using autologous periosteum combined with fascia lata under stable external fixation

Different bone grafts with guided bone regeneration for treatment of bone defects around implants

Long-Term Stability of Autogenous Bone Grafts Following Combined Application with Guided Bone Regeneration

Experiment of GBR for Repair of Peri-Implant Alveolar Defects in Beagle Dogs.

Augmentation of Peri-implant Bone Defects with Different Bone Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Pilot Experimental Study in the Dog

Acceleration of De Novo Bone Formation with a Novel Bioabsorbable Film: a Histomorphometric Study in Vivo

Guided tissue regeneration combined with osseous grafting in suprabony periodontal lesions. An experimental study in the dog

Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects in the Rabbit Ulna Using Periosteum Encapsulated Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Loaded Poly (Lactic-Co-glycolic Acid) Scaffolds.

Guided bone regeneration and simultaneous implant placement using membrane in combination with titanium mesh for repair of alveolar defects in Beagle dogs

Preliminary Study on Poly (hydroxybutyratehydroxyvalerate) Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration in Vivo

Ossification and Bone Regeneration in a Canine GBR Model, Part 1: Thick vs Thin Glycated Cross-Linked Collagen Devices

Repair of segmental radial defects in dogs using tailor-made titanium mesh cages with plates combined with calcium phosphate granules and basic fibroblast growth factor-binding ion complex gel

Effect Of Gbr In Combination With Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral And/Or Enamel Matrix Proteins On The Healing Of Critical-Size Defects

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and gelatin-nano-hydroxyapatite combination in canine femoral defect repair

Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes in the treatment of naturally occurring periodontal defects in dogs

Application of Enriched Bone Marrow Compound with Fibrin Glue in Repairing Old Radial Bone Defect in Rabbits

Repair of orbital bone defects in canines using grafts of enriched autologous bone marrow stromal cells

[Experimental Study on Repair of Bone Defect in Femoral Head by Enhanced Autogenous Bone Combined with Bone Morphogenetic Protein].

Personalizing Β-Tcp Porous Scaffolds to Promote Osteogenesis: a Study of Segmental Femoral Defects in Beagle Models

A radiographic research for bone-defect restoration around BLB implants

Enhancing guided bone regeneration with cross‐linked collagen‐conjugated xenogeneic bone blocks and membrane fixation: A preclinical in vivo study