[Comparing BFA with BuCyA As a Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Leukemias].

Yun Tang,Jian-Jun Li,Xin-Chuan Chen,Zhi-Gang Liu,Zhong-Ping Lu,Xiao-Ou Huang,Ting Liu
2014-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare BFA (busulfan, fludarabine plus cytarabine) with BuCyA (busulfan, cyclophoshpamide plus cytarabine) as the conditioning regimens in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemias.METHODS:83 patients with acute leukemia were allocated to BFA group (busulfan 3.2 mg/(kg x d), -9 d-6 d; fludarabine 30 mg/(m2 x d), -5 d(-) -1 d; cytarabine, 1 g/(m2 x d), -5 d(-) - 1 d) or BuCyA group (busulfan, 3.2 mg/(kg x d), -8 d(-) - 5 d; cyclophoshpamide 60 mg/(kg x d),-2 d(-) - 1 d; cytarabine, 3 g/(m2 x d), -4 d(-) - 3 d). Their three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate, complete remission (CR) rate and incidences of acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and hemorrhagic cystitis were monitored.RESULTS:BuCyA group had lower DFS (40.0% vs 61.9%, P = 0.039 9) and lower CR (44.0% vs 71.6%, P = 0.031 0) than BFA group. About 20% of patients treated with BuCyA were not in remission, compared with 51.6% of those treated with BFA. aGVHD occurred in 46.7% patients in the BuCyA group and 50.9% patients in the BFA group, which were 23.3% and 9.4%, respectively, for those graded III - IV. Severe infection occurred in 23.3% patients in the BuCyA group and 22.9% patients in the BFA group. Severe bleeding occurred in 26.7% patients in the BuCyA group and 11.4% patients in the BFA group. The incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis in the BuCyA group and BFA group was 16.7% and 5.7%, respectively.CONCLUSION:BFA is a safer and more effective conditioning regimen compared with BuCyA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?