Abstract:Abstract Background MET amplification (amp) is a resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Tepotinib (TEP), an oral, selective MET TKI, has shown promising antitumor activity in combination with gefitinib (GEF) in patients with MET+ EGFR-mutant NSCLC and acquired resistance to 1st-line EGFR TKIs in a phase 1b/2 study (NCT01982955). In the phase 1b part of the study, 4/6 patients with METamp had an objective response with TEP+GEF (67%). Methods In the phase 2 part of the study, Asian patients with advanced MET+ (MET2+ or 3+ by immunohistochemistry and/or METamp by in-situ hybridization) EGFR-mutant T790M- NSCLC and acquired resistance to 1st-line EGFR TKIs were randomized to receive oral TEP 500 mg + GEF 250 mg once daily or platinum + pemetrexed chemotherapy (CTx). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included PFS by independent review committee (IRC), overall response rate (ORR), and safety. Data from a minimum follow-up of 6-months are presented (cut-off 26 Mar 2018) for the pre-planned analysis of patients with METamp, defined as gene copy number (GCN) ≥5 and/or MET/CEP7 ratio ≥2. Results Low recruitment halted enrolment into phase 2. From 24 Apr 2015 to 12 Jun 2017, 55/156 planned patients were enrolled; 19 had METamp (TEP+GEF, 12; CTx, 7) and are included in this analysis. Median age of METamp patients was 60.4 years (range 42-74), 6 were men, 13 were never smokers, 5 had ECOG PS 0 and 14 had PS 1. Median GCN was 8.8 (range 4.8-29.5); 18 patients had GCN ≥5, 13 had MET/CEP7 ratio ≥2. Median TEP+GEF treatment duration was 37 weeks (range 4.6-91.9) and 4 patients are still receiving treatment, ongoing for ≥18 months. Investigator-assessed PFS improved with TEP+GEF vs CTx (mPFS 21.2 vs 4.2 months; HR 0.17 [90% CI 0.05, 0.57]), as well as IRC-assessed PFS (19.8 vs 5.5 months; HR 0.25 [90% CI 0.07, 0.85]). ORR also improved with TEP+GEF (investigator: 66.7% vs 42.9%; OR 2.67 [90% CI 0.37, 19.56] and IRC: 75.0% vs 42.9%; OR 4.00 [90% CI 0.51, 31.38]). Disease control was achieved in 11 (91.7%) patients receiving TEP+GEF vs 5 (71.4%) patients receiving CTx. Related grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 6 (50.0%) patients receiving TEP+GEF and 5 (71.4%) patients receiving CTx. The most common related TEAEs in the TEP+GEF arm were diarrhea (TEP+GEF 50.0% vs CTx 14.3%) and amylase increased (TEP+GEF 41.7% vs CTx 0%) and in the CTx arm were anemia (TEP+GEF 0% vs CTx 57.1%), white blood cell count decreased (TEP+GEF 8.3% vs CTx 57.1%), neutrophil count decreased (TEP+GEF 0% vs CTx 57.1%), and nausea (TEP+GEF 8.3% vs CTx 42.9%). Conclusions Promising antitumor activity with TEP+GEF was reported in patients with METamp, EGFR-mutant T790M- NSCLC and acquired resistance to 1st-line EGFR TKIs. No new safety signals were observed. METamp can be considered a biomarker for tepotinib that should be further explored. Citation Format: James Chih-Hsin Yang, Jianying Zhou, Dong-Wan Kim, Azura Rozila Ahmad, Ross Andrew Soo, Rolf Bruns, Josef Straub, Andreas Johne, Jürgen Scheele, Keunchil Park, Yi-Long Wu. Tepotinib + gefitinib vs chemotherapy in MET-amplified EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Predefined subgroup analysis of a Phase Ib/II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT193.

Volitinib, a Potent and Highly Selective C‐met Inhibitor, Effectively Blocks C‐met Signaling and Growth in C‐met Amplified Gastric Cancer Patient‐derived Tumor Xenograft Models

Synergistic Antitumor Effects of Cmet Inhibitor in Combination with Anti-Vegf in Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenograft Models

Cmet As A Potential Therapeutic Target In Gastric Cancer

Establishment of Patient-Derived Gastric Cancer Xenografts: a Useful Tool for Preclinical Evaluation of Targeted Therapies Involving Alterations in HER-2, MET and FGFR2 Signaling Pathways

The Significance of MET Expression and Strategies of Targeting MET Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Characterization and Validation of Potential Therapeutic Targets Based on the Molecular Signature of Patient-Derived Xenografts in Gastric Cancer

Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Selective MET Inhibitor, Savolitinib, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: \nSafety, Efficacy, and Biomarkers

Characterization of MET Alterations in 37 Gastroesophageal Cancer Cell Lines for MET-Targeted Therapy

Precision Treatment Paradigm: Genomic Features and Therapeutic Implications in Mesenchymal‐epithelial Transition‐amplified Gastric Cancer

A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Outcome in Driver-Gene Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with MET Overexpression Treated with Gumarontinib

Luteolin exerts a marked antitumor effect in cMet-overexpressing patient-derived tumor xenograft models of gastric cancer

Abstract 597: Vebreltinib: A novel brain-penetrating MET kinase inhibitor demonstrates the mechanism of action and pharmacological anti-tumor activity in diverse patient-derived MET-dysregulated tumor models at clinically relevant drug levels

P-053 MET Overexpression and Amplification Define a Distinct Molecular Subgroup for Targeted Therapies in Gastric Cancer

Abstract 5848: Unraveling c-MET targeting resistance mechanisms in gastric cancer via single-cell transcriptome analysis; Novel therapeutic target discovery of ERO1A and VEGFA

Preventative and Therapeutic Effects of Metformin in Gastric Cancer: A New Contribution of an Old Friend

Abstract CT193: Tepotinib + gefitinib vs chemotherapy in<i>MET-</i>amplified EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Predefined subgroup analysis of a Phase Ib/II study

Apatinib for Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Arm, Phase II Trial.

A phase II trial of a selective c-Met inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) monotherapy as a second- or third-line therapy in the patients with metastatic gastric cancer

Novel c-Met inhibitor suppresses the growth of c-Met-addicted gastric cancer cells

Identifying novel therapeutic targets in gastric cancer using genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening

The Role of cMET in Gastric Cancer—A Review of the Literature