Validity and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the 5-Item WHO Well-Being Index
Sai-fu Fung,Chris Yiu Wah Kong,Yi-man Liu,Qian Huang,Zike Xiong,Zhiquan Jiang,Fangfang Zhu,Zhenting Chen,Kun Sun,Huiqin Zhao,Ping Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.872436
IF: 5.2
2022-03-30
Frontiers in Public Health
Abstract:Aims This article evaluates the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 5-item WHO Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in mainland China. Methods Two cross-sectional studies with 1,414 participants from a university in China were conducted. The Chinese version of the WHO-5 was assessed to determine its internal consistency, concurrent validity, factorial validity, and construct validity. Results The results indicate that the WHO-5 is unidimensional and has good internal consistency, with Cronbach's a = 0.85 and 0.81 in Study 1 ( n = 903) and Study 2 ( n = 511), respectively. The findings also demonstrate that the WHO-5 has good concurrent validity with other well-established measures of wellbeing, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and mental wellbeing. The results of confirmatory factor analysis also suggest that the scale has a good model fit. Conclusions This study provides empirical data demonstrating that the Chinese version of the WHO-5 has good psychometric properties. The scale can be a useful measure in epistemological studies and clinical research related to wellbeing in Chinese populations.
public, environmental & occupational health