Abstract:Since the workings of the human neural system are still not well understood, creating models that can measure behavior at the neural level remains a challenge. This is not surprising, given that the field of the neurocognitive sciences is still relatively young.To narrow the gap, we have invited researchers to address some of the issues mentioned in our call for papers. We included seven papers in this issue:Huang and colleagues proposed a neural dipole model to simulate how different brain regions interact. Although such interactions are often explored in fMRI studies, the authors examined this in EEG data. They also collected eye movement data during reading aloud to examine the eye-voice span. Their findings indicated that the time lag between eye fixations and voice onset decreased when discourse was coherent but remained constant in the opposite case. A neural network involved in reading, spanning from the superior parietal cortex to the frontal lobe, exhibited stronger connectivity when participants read incoherent sentences. This nicely illustrates the role of coherence, cohesion, semantics and context as facilitating factors for reading.Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent one of the most promising applications of neurocomputational models, because brain activation is here taken to control technical devices. Their current effectiveness, however, remains quite limited. Herbert proposes a roadmap to better attune BCIs to linguistic and cultural differences. She argues that interindividual variations in perception, action, cognition, language, and emotion must be considered in BCIs, and that language training could enhance their performance. Her work aligns well with another research topic on language, culture and the brain. While Herbert's goal of refining computational architectures was grounded in linguistic theories, Blache took a different approach. He reflected on classical linguistic theories and explored how they can be reconciled with recent developments within the memory unification and control theory, as well as with the predictive coding framework. His formal approach could serve as an interpretable alternative to self-learning systems, once it is implemented as an algorithmic model. Even if such a model may not predict data as effectively as machine learning models, it may offer a framework that can be experimentally tested. We believe that the strategy used in physics, which divides labor between experimental and theoretical scientists, may also be beneficial for researchers in linguistics and the social sciences.Though algorithmic models provide more formal tools for expressing theoretical ideas, physics, as the foundational natural science, often relies on mathematical models. Neural models excel at prediction, simpler mathematical models -such as regression models-can offer better explanatory power and computational efficiency. Heitmeier and colleagues investigated the performance of such models during Dutch visual word recognition and Mandarin auditory lexical decision tasks. They also simulated the development of childdirected speech, considering how word frequency changes over time, noting that certain words might be frequent in early learning but rarely used later.There are many models available for various applications. Among the most successful are connectionist models. Chang and colleagues trained a variant of the triangle model with phonology-focused and meaning-focused instructions, as well as with an instruction balancing phonology and meaning. They found that a semantic reading instruction led to greater reliance on meaning rather than phonology. It also resulted in more phonological errors, possibly due to individually developed reading styles. Their work ties into previous behavioral and neuroimaging studies, highlighting how computational models can simulate individual differences in reading strategies, especially for beginning readers. There are still many mysteries to be unraveled on how the brain generates the human mind during language processing. After seven decades of progress in connectionist models, however, the recent Nobel Prize in Physics awarded to Hinton and Hopfield serves as a testament to the value of ongoing theoretical development, even when the path ahead appears complex and is often overlooked or misunderstood. Let's use this example as inspiration to keep moving forward and trust our intuitions, much as Hinton did for many decades even when expert system technology seemed to have won the race in AI research.

Networks for Memory, Perception, and Decision-Making, and Beyond to How the Syntax for Language Might Be Implemented in the Brain.

The Cortical Maps of Hierarchical Linguistic Structures During Speech Perception

Language and syntax in the brain

A low-activity cortical network selectively encodes syntax

How the Brain Formulates Memory: A Spatio-Temporal Model Research Frontier.

The Cortical Organization of Syntax

A Neurobiologically Constrained Cortex Model of Semantic Grounding With Spiking Neurons and Brain-Like Connectivity

Organizing Principles of Real-Time Memory Encoding: Neural Clique Assemblies and Universal Neural Codes

The Relative Advantages of Sparse Versus Distributed Encoding for Associative Neuronal Networks in the Brain

Neurobiological mechanisms for language, symbols and concepts: Clues from brain-constrained deep neural networks

ROSE: A Neurocomputational Architecture for Syntax

Time Is of the Essence: Neural Codes, Synchronies, Oscillations, Architectures

Neural dynamics express syntax in the time domain during natural story listening

The neural basis of combinatory syntax and semantics

Distributed Sensitivity to Syntax and Semantics throughout the Language Network

A Computational Theory for the Emergence of Grammatical Categories in Cortical Dynamics

High-dimensional brain. A tool for encoding and rapid learning of memories by single neurons

Editorial: Neurocomputational models of language processing

Neural Mechanism of Language

What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax

Neurological basis of language and sequential cognition: Evidence from simulation, aphasia, and ERP studies