Abstract:Abstract Aims For patients with diabetes, the European guidelines updated the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction recommendations using diabetes-specific models with age-specific cut-offs, whereas American guidelines still advise models derived from the general population. We aimed to compare the performance of four cardiovascular risk models in diabetes populations. Methods and results Patients with diabetes from the CHERRY study, an electronic health records-based cohort study in China, were identified. Five-year CVD risk was calculated using original and recalibrated diabetes-specific models [Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: PreterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) and the Hong Kong cardiovascular risk model (HK)] and general population-based models [Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) and Prediction for Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Risk in China (China-PAR)]. During a median 5.8-year follow-up, 46 558 patients had 2605 CVD events. C-statistics were 0.711 [95% confidence interval: 0.693–0.729] for ADVANCE and 0.701 (0.683–0.719) for HK in men, and 0.742 (0.725–0.759) and 0.732 (0.718–0.747) in women. C-statistics were worse in two general population-based models. Recalibrated ADVANCE underestimated risk by 1.2% and 16.8% in men and women, whereas PCE underestimated risk by 41.9% and 24.2% in men and women. With the age-specific cut-offs, the overlap of the high-risk patients selected by every model pair ranged from only 22.6% to 51.2%. When utilizing the fixed cut-off at 5%, the recalibrated ADVANCE selected similar high-risk patients in men (7400) as compared to the age-specific cut-offs (7102), whereas age-specific cut-offs exhibited a reduction in the selection of high-risk patients in women (2646 under age-specific cut-offs vs. 3647 under fixed cut-off). Conclusion Diabetes-specific CVD risk prediction models showed better discrimination for patients with diabetes. High-risk patients selected by different models varied significantly. Age-specific cut-offs selected fewer patients at high CVD risk especially in women. Lay summary This large electronic health records-based real-world study indicated that the diabetes-specific cardiovascular risk models had better discriminative abilities than the models derived from the general population in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes. Current guidelines-recommended models, i.e. ADVANCE, PCE, and China-PAR, selected significantly different high-risk groups with various observed cardiovascular risks, indicating the potential considerable misclassification of risk stratification in clinical decision-making for preventive interventions.Compared with the fixed cut-off, the influence of the age-specific cut-offs for high risk of cardiovascular disease was different in men and women: age-specific cut-offs selected ∼27% fewer high-risk patients in women but similar in men.

Prediction of 4-Year Incident Diabetes in Older Chinese: Recalibration of the Framingham Diabetes Score on Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study.

Prediction of the 20-year incidence of diabetes in older Chinese: Application of the competing risk method in a longitudinal study

Development of a new risk score for incident type 2 diabetes using updated diagnostic criteria in middle-aged and older chinese.

A competing-risk-based score for predicting twenty-year risk of incident diabetes: the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Ageing study

Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes:verification in Chinese patients

A Simple Risk Score for Identifying Individuals with Impaired Fasting Glucose in the Southern Chinese Population.

Development and validation of a non-invasive assessment tool for screening prevalent undiagnosed diabetes in middle-aged and elderly Chinese

Adiposity and Incident Diabetes Within 4 Years of Follow‐up: the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study

A Simple Model for Predicting 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk in Middle-Aged to Older Chinese: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study

A Bayesian network model of new-onset diabetes in older Chinese: The Guangzhou biobank cohort study

Prediction of 5-year risk of diabetes mellitus in relatively low risk middle-aged and elderly adults

Development and validation of a simple risk score for prevalent undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Southern Chinese population

Validation and comparison of cardiovascular risk prediction equations in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes

Development of a New Scoring System to Predict 5-Year Incident Diabetes Risk in Middle-Aged and Older Chinese

Development and validation of a prediction model estimating the 10-year risk for type 2 diabetes in China

A Prediction Model for Prediabetes Risk in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations: A Prospective Cohort Study in China

Nonlaboratory-based Risk Assessment Algorithm for Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Developed on a Nation-Wide Diabetes Survey.

Improved Framingham Risk Scores of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Beijing Community: A 10-Year Prospective Study of the Effects of Multifactorial Interventions on Cardiovascular Risk Factors (The Beijing Communities Diabetes Study 22)

A Chinese Risk Score Model for Identifying Postprandial Hyperglycemia Without Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Predicting the Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Elderly Using Machine Learning Techniques

Predictive Value of Fasting Glucose, Postload Glucose, and Hemoglobin A1c on Risk of Diabetes and Complications in Chinese Adults