Design, Synthesis, Antifungal, and Antioxidant Activities of (E)-6-((2-phenylhydrazono)methyl)quinoxaline Derivatives.

Mao Zhang,Zhi-Cheng Dai,Shao-Song Qian,Jun-Yan Liu,Yu Xiao,Ai-Min Lu,Hai-Liang Zhu,Jian-Xin Wang,Yong-Hao Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504359p
IF: 6.1
2014-01-01
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Abstract:Different substituted phenylhydrazone groups were linked to the quinoxaline scaffold to provide 26 compounds (6a-6z). Their structures were confirmed by (1)H and (13)C NMR, MS, elemental analysis, and X-ray single-crystal diffraction. The antifungal activities of these compounds against Rhizoctonia solani were evaluated in vitro. Compound 6p is the most promising one among all the tested compounds with an EC50 of 0.16 μg·mL(-1), more potent than the coassayed positive control fungicide carbendazim (EC50: 1.42 μg·mL(-1)). In addition, these compounds were subjected to antioxidant assay by employing diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and mice microsome lipid peroxidation (LPO) methods. Most of these compounds are potent antioxidants. The strongest compounds are 6e (EC50: 7.60 μg·mL(-1), DPPH) and 6a (EC50: 0.96 μg·mL(-1), LPO), comparative to or more potent than the positive control Trolox [EC50: 5.90 μg·mL(-1) (DPPH) and 18.23 μg·mL(-1) (LPO)]. The structure and activity relationships were also discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?