Abstract:Organ failure and tissue loss are challenging health issues due to the widespread occurrence of injuries, the lack of donated organs for transplantation, and the limitations of conventional artificial implants. The field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine emerged to solve these issues by providing biological alternatives that restore, maintain, or improve tissue function for harvested tissues and organs [1–5]. In a typical tissue engineering approach, cells are grown in a three-dimensional (3D) biodegradable scaffold, which, ideally, should perform the structural and biochemical functions of the natural extracellular matrix (ECM), providing cells with topological and chemical cues as well as mechanical support until the cell-produced ECM takes over. Therefore, there is a set of key characteristics that the scaffold should have. First, adequate space or porosity with high interconnectivity is needed throughout the 3D scaffold in order to allow cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation into the desired cell phenotypes for new tissue formation [6, 7]. A porous structure not only defines the initial void space available for cell seeding/ingrowth and new tissue formation, but also determines the mass transport pathways. Second, appropriate surface architecture is critical since this is where the cell–matrix interactions occur. In connective tissues, such as bone, skin, ligament, and tendon, the ECM consists primarily of proteoglycans and fibrous proteins, such as collagen. The fibrous architecture of collagen contributes to the mechanical stabilities of the ECM, and plays a vital role in cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation [8]. Type I collagen is the most abundant type of collagen and forms nanofiber bundles with fiber diameter ranging from 50 to 500 nm. A nanofibrous (NF) surface is desired to mimic the natural ECM and is found to be advantageous in improving cell attachment, migration, proliferation, and differentiation [9]. Therefore, polymeric scaffolds with porous structure at the micrometer scale and fibrous architecture at the nanometer dimension should be promising candidates for tissue regeneration. Although it is not the focus of this chapter, chemical and biological functionalization of scaffolds can enhance cell–biomaterial interactions [10].

Scaffolds Reinforced by Fibers or Tubes for Tissue Repair

Fiber-reinforced Scaffolds in Soft Tissue Engineering.

Biocomposites Reinforced by Fibers or Tubes As Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering or Regenerative Medicine

The Potential Matrix and Reinforcement Materials for the Preparation of the Scaffolds Reinforced by Fibers or Tubes for Tissue Repair

Scaffolds for tissue fabrication

Extracellular scaffold design for ultra-soft microtissue engineering

Scaffolding Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Applications

Developing fibrin-based biomaterials/scaffolds in tissue engineering

A Review: Textile Technologies for Single and Multi‐Layer Tubular Soft Tissue Engineering

Application of Collagen Scaffold in Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and New Perspectives

Natural polymer-based scaffolds for soft tissue repair

From Soft to Hard Biomimetic Materials: Tuning Micro/Nano-Architecture of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration

Nanofibrous Polymer Scaffolds With Designed Pore Structure For Regeneration

Applications of Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: Current Utilization and Future Prospective

The Biocompatibility of the Scaffolds Reinforced by Fibers or Tubes for Tissue Repair

Novel Biomimetic Fiber Incorporated Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering

Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions

Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for soft-hard interface regeneration

Bioactive Materials for Soft Tissue Repair

Correction to “biomimetic Silk Scaffolds with an Amorphous Structure for Soft Tissue Engineering”