Abstract:Background: Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic bipolar disorder may have distinct and shared neurophysiological indicators of disease risk, although a psychosis continuum model accounts best for neurobiological data when groups are defined by DSM diagnoses. Previous B-SNIP data, however, document 3 distinct psychosis Biotypes with unique neurobiological features not accounted for by a continuum of severity model. Disrupted sensory processing is a core feature of psychotic disorders and is likely a major contributor to associated cognitive impairments. This study investigated plasticity of sensory-attentional processing. Deviations in these neurobiological features are better captured by biotype designations than a psychosis continuum. Methods: EEG was collected while healthy individuals (N = 221) and psychosis probands (N = 455) were administered auditory oddball (OB) and paired stimuli (PS) tasks. Complex responses evoked by these tasks exhibit amplitude changes with tone repetition in healthy individuals, indexing sensorineural plasticity mechanisms. Adaptation to repetition was assessed by comparing neural responses to early, middle, and late trials (eg, the 150 OB trials were analyzed as 3 sets of 50 trials). Analyses were calculated using 2 psychosis subgrouping systems: (1) Biotypes and (2) Schizo-Bipolar Scale (SBS), a psychosis continuum scale. Results: Clinical-based subgroupings revealed lower amplitude neural responses than healthy individuals for both tasks. A minority of ERP components discriminated SBS subgroups, though not in a consistent pattern. Likewise, neural adaptation effects were largely similar across SBS groups. Biotype-based subgroups however show a number of differences. Biotypes differed drastically in overall neural response amplitudes, with Biotype 1 being the most impaired, Biotype 2 showing the greatest amplitude and often not differing from healthy, and Biotype 3 showing slightly lesser amplitude than Biotype 2. Trial repetition analyses revealed differences in the extent of neural adaptation, with Biotype 1 showing little change over time. Further, biotypes differed on adaption functions. Biotype 3, like the healthy group, showed a much larger decrease between early and middle trials than between middle and late trials. In contrast, Biotype 2 often showed a steady amplitude decrease over time. Conclusion: Our findings using clinical symptom-based subgrouping suggest that while auditory disruptions may differ slightly according to psychosis severity, these differences are inconsistent and do not extent to neural adaptation mechanisms. Biotypes, however, revealed subgroup differences in overall neural response levels, the extent of neural adaptation, and the rate at which adaptation occurs. These findings provide support for neurobiological heterogeneity in brain plasticity not accounted for by clinical symptomatology.

Regressing to Prior Response Preference After Set Switching Implicates Striatal Dysfunction Across Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the B-SNIP Study.

Behavioral Response Inhibition in Psychotic Disorders: Diagnostic Specificity, Familiality and Relation to Generalized Cognitive Deficit

Antisaccade error rates and gap effects in psychosis syndromes from bipolar-schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes 2 (B-SNIP2)

Disease and Drug Effects on Internally-Generated and Externally-Elicited Responses in First Episode Schizophrenia and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder

Neuropsychological Evidence for Frontostriatal Dysfunction in Schizophrenia.

Deficits in Generalized Cognitive Ability, Visual Sensorimotor Function, and Inhibitory Control Represent Discrete Domains of Neurobehavioral Deficit in Psychotic Disorders.

Emotion Recognition Deficits in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder: Findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) Study

Elevated antisaccade error rate as an intermediate phenotype for psychosis across diagnostic categories.

Response Suppression Deficits in Treatment-Naïve First-Episode Patients with Schizophrenia, Psychotic Bipolar Disorder and Psychotic Major Depression

Discrimination Learning, Reversal, and Set-Shifting in First-Episode Schizophrenia: Stability over Six Years and Specific Associations with Medication Type and Disorganization Syndrome.

Predicting psychosis across diagnostic boundaries: Behavioral and computational modeling evidence for impaired reinforcement learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with a history of psychosis.

Reinforcement and Reversal Learning in First-Episode Psychosis.

Impaired Context Processing is Attributable to Global Neuropsychological Impairment in Schizophrenia and Psychotic Bipolar Disorder

Comparison of Set-Shifting Ability in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia and Frontal Lobe Damage

Longitudinal studies of antisaccades in antipsychotic-naive first-episode schizophrenia.

Working memory impairment in probands with schizoaffective disorder and first degree relatives of schizophrenia probands extend beyond deficits predicted by generalized neuropsychological impairment

Double dissociation between P300 components and task switch error type in healthy but not psychosis participants

Neuropsychological Impairment in Prodromal, First-Episode, and Chronic Psychosis: Assessing Rbans Performance

Deviation from Expected Cognitive Ability Across Psychotic Disorders

A Comparison of Neuropsychological Dysfunction in First-Episode Psychosis Patients with Unipolar Depression, Bipolar Disorder, and Schizophrenia.

SU65. Neural Adaptation Differences among Psychosis Biotypes