Abstract:BACKGROUND: Sacrocolpopexy is the gold standard procedure for treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients with apical defects. Different surgical approaches have emerged and been utilized successively, including traditional laparoscopy, single-hole laparoscopy, robotic laparoscopy, vaginal-assisted laparoscopy, and transvaginal approaches. Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) has attracted increasing attention as an emerging surgical technique and has unique advantages, such as a "simulated wrist" mechanical arm and high-definition three-dimensional (3D) visual field, which has gradually begun to be utilized in the clinical setting.METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting checklist, and a systematic literature search was conducted on six databases from their inception to 1st March 2020. We evaluated patients with POP who underwent RSC or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC), outcomes (including perioperative outcomes: blood loss, operating times, blood transfusion, and hospital stay), surgery-related complications, as well as cure and recurrence rates.RESULTS: A total of 49 articles were available, including 3,014 patients, among which 18 were comparative studies on LSC <i>vs.</i> RSC, and 31 were non-comparative single-arm studies on RSC. For RSC, median operative time was 226 [90-604] minutes, estimated blood loss was 56 [5-1,500] mL, and hospital stay was 1.55 [1-16] days. Intraoperative complications and postoperative complications occurred in 74 (2.7%) and 360 (13.0%) patients, respectively. Of 2,768 RSC patients, 40 had been converted from a robot-assisted approach to other approaches, and 134 of 1,852 patients (7.2%) have recurrent prolapses of any compartment. Compared to LSC, RSC was associated with significantly lower blood loss and lower conversion rate. However, more operative time was observed in RSC. No significant differences were observed in perioperative transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or objective recurrence between RSC and LSC.CONCLUSIONS: RSC's application seems to contribute some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both approaches appear to promote equivalent clinical outcomes. Notably, heterogeneity among studies might have affected the outcome of the study. Consequently, high-quality and large-sample randomized trials comparing both techniques are necessitated.

[Preliminary Study on Clinical Application of Robotic Sacral Hysteropexy in Treatment of Uterine Prolapse].

Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse

Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Le transit baryté en double contraste dans le diagnostic des ulcérations gastriques

The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy

The Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for the Patient with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Bladder compliance dynamics of pelvic organ prolapse in women undergoing robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

Laparoscopic Suture Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse

Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis

Robotic-assisted apical lateral suspension for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and perioperative outcomes

Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Discussion on the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of uterine prolapse

Reviewer ' s report Title : High prevalence of myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain

Robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with complete bladder eversion

Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach

The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Robotic Hysterectomy with Ureter Identification and Uterine Artery Ligation for Benign Gynecological Conditions: An Early-Year Single-Center Experience

Robot-Assisted Sacropexy with the Novel HUGO Robot-Assisted Surgery System: Initial Experience and Surgical Setup at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

Effectiveness of laparoscopic pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy