Abstract:We extended our detection model of achromatic spatial vision (Rovamo, J., Mustonen, J., & Näsänen, R. (1994a). Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area. Vision Research, 34, 1301-1314) to colour vision by taking into account the fact that due to the spatio-chromatic opponency of retinal ganglion cells and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) neurons, equiluminous chromatic gratings are not affected by precortical lateral inhibition. We then tested the extended model by using Mullen's experimental data (Mullen, K. J. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human color vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. Journal of Physiology, 359, 381-400). The band-pass shape of the spatial contrast sensitivity function for luminance-modulated green and yellow gratings transformed to a low-pass shape, resembling the chromatic spatial contrast sensitivity function for red-green and blue-yellow equiluminous gratings, when the effect of precortical lateral inhibition on grating contrast was computationally removed by dividing luminance contrast sensitivities by spatial frequency (i.e. by af, where a = 1 degree). After the removal of this direct effect of lateral inhibition, there still remained a residual shape difference between the spatial contrast sensitivity functions for chromatic and luminance gratings. It was due to indirect reduction of grating visibility by quantal noise high-pass filtered by precortical lateral inhibition. When this indirect effect of quantal noise was also removed, contrast sensitivity for luminance gratings was about twice the sensitivity for chromatic gratings at all spatial frequencies. This was evidently due to the fact that the chromatic contrast of the equiluminous grating at the opponent stage (Cole, G. R., Hine, T. & McIihagga, W. (1993). Detection mechanisms in L-, M-, and S-cone contrast space. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 38-51) was about half of the luminance contrast of either of its chromatic component. Thus, if the contrast of the equiluminous chromatic grating were not expressed as the Michelson contrast of one chromatic component grating against its own background (Mullen, K. J. (1985). The contrast sensitivity of human color vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings. Journal of Physiology, 359, 381-400) but as chromatic contrast at the opponent stage, contrast sensitivity would be the same for chromatic and luminance gratings.

The Time Course of Contrast Adaptation Measured with a New Method: Detection of Ramped Contrast.

Exploring timescales of adaptation mechanisms along the visual-processing hierarchy

Contrast threshold recovery after bleaching during cone‐mediated mesopic adaptation: The effect of test conditions

A Study of Spatial Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Based on Different Colors, Luminance, and Stimulus Patterns

Time Course Chromatic Adaptation under Highly Saturated Illuminants

Four Days of Visual Contrast Adaptation: Effects on Perceived Contrast Grow Monotonically While Effects on Orientation Rise then Fall.

Distinct Mechanisms Control Contrast Adaptation over Different Timescales.

Distinct Mechanism for Long-Term Contrast Adaptation

A Study of Spatial Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity Based on Different Colour Background

The Timescale of Adaptation at Early and Mid-Level Stages of Visual Processing

Long-term Orientation-Specific Contrast Reduction Reveals Plasticity of Mechanisms of Contrast Appearance

Spontaneous Recovery of Effects of Contrast Adaptation Without Awareness

Classification images for contrast discrimination

Modelling spatial contrast sensitivity functions for chromatic and luminance-modulated gratings

Adaptive contrast gain control and information maximization

The Effect of Adaptation Time, Adaptation Luminance and Glare on Contrast of Human's Eye

A Study of Visible Chromatic Contrast Threshold Based on Different Color Directions and Spatial Frequencies

What Determines Contrast Sensitivity: an External Noise Study Across Spatial Frequencies?

Four Days of Visual Contrast Deprivation Reveals Limits of Neuronal Adaptation.

Repeated Contrast Adaptation Does Not Cause Habituation of the Adapter

Functional-pathway-dominant Contrast Adaptation and Sensitization in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells