Abstract:Surgical complications after the transthoracic operation for esophageal cancer mainly include anastomatic fistula, thoraco-stomach fistula, stenosis of anastomosis, gastric perforation, gastric volvulus, diaphragmatic hernia, wound infection, and some other pulmonary complications. Unfortunately, there are few reports about the complications caused by position change of the chest tube until now. We presented an unusual case of a patient who underwent a transthoracic operation for esophageal cancer in our department on August 17, 2006, and a lot of intragastric material was found in his chest tube 17 days later, endoscopic examination suggested that the chest tube had inserted into the stomach. We tried to discuss the etiology and clinical management for this case as well. CASE REPORT A 56-year-old Chinese man without any history of esophageal or gastric disease was newly admitted as esophageal carcinoma to our department on August 14, 2006. His complaint only was retrosternal burning for over 20 days. An endoscopic report from his local hospital suggested that a cauliform mass, of which the biopsy result was high-differentiated squamous carcinoma of esophagus, was found at the very place of 30 cm away from the incisor teeth. The patient thereafter underwent a transthoracic operation of esophagectomy and esophago-gastrostomy with the stapler manufactured by Shanghai Johnson & Johnson Corporation on August 17, 2006, and was treated with fasting, antibiotics and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after the operation. Everything went well in the first 7 days after the operation, his temperature returned to 36.5–37.5°C, and his condition got better day by day, so we attempted to stop his gastric decompression and allow him to take some fluidity on day 7 after the operation. But soon his wife came to us recounting that she saw some white floc in the water-sealed bottle right after the patient had taken a little of soybean milk. We suspected that the patient had presented anastomatic fistula, and inserted gastric tube for decompression again immediately. On 22 day after the operation, we tried to stop the patient from gastric drainage again as his condition was under control. Two days later, the patient got a developing abdominal distension at the upper abdomen. Although the distension was quickly released by a belch, a lot of dark green juice substitutively appeared in his chest tube. Without any sign of toxic symptom such as fever or empyema, the patient received the following examinations: blood routine test showed white blood cell (WBC): 8.9×109, N: 77.5%. Esophagographic examination indicated anastomatic fistula, while endoscopic examination suggested a fistula at the edge of esophagogastric anastomosis and the chest tube was visible in the stomach (Fig.). Then we chose a kind of conservative therapy of 3 tubes: we remained the chest tube in the stomach for gastric drainage; kept gastric tube for decompression; and placed duodenal feeding tube for life support. Ten days later, through an examination of fistulography with meglucamine diatrizoate we discovered that the fistula had recovered, so we tried to pull the chest tube out gradually as the drainage volume remained below 50 ml/d. On day 39 and day 41 after the operation, the patient received a test of oral methylence blue, as no abnormal drainage in his chest tube, we pulled his chest tube out thoroughly and then stopped his gastric tube. Seven days later, the patient was discharged healthily.Fig.: The chest tube inserted into the stomachDISCUSSION The chest tube was found to touch the stomach so closely that we had to consider that the insertion was initiative. The ways to invade the stomach were three reasons as follows: First is operation skills. Anastomatic fistula is a very common complication after the operation for esophageal cancer.1,2 One review of surgical treatment for esophageal cancer indicated that many anastomatic fistula diagnosed were actually rupture of proximal esophagus or local perforation of thoraco-stomach.3 The patient with severe anastomatic fistula may present fever, empyema, and some other toxic symptoms. This complication is changeable and troublesome with highmortality. Considering these differentiative characteristics, we believed the complication our patient suffered was only a small fistula so that there was no sign of danger. On review of the patient's history of operation, we found some potential risks: (1) During the operation the stomach was dragged and kneaded too excessively to recover its blood-supply, and this may cause extensive capillary thromboembolism and lead to gastric perforation.4,5 (2) Some small eyelets left when the needle penetrated the flimsy gastric wall may be enlarged by tying, severe cough, gastric dilatation, and some other stimulations. (3) The suture was too close to the anamostmatic nail, which may cause ischemic necrosis. (4) The sutures were made too dense, leading to edema of the anastomosis. (5) The stapler was pressed so heavily that the borderline membrane and muscle of anastomosis were all cut off. Second is position change of the chest tube. We exactly placed the chest tube at the place of 3 cm away from the anastomosis, while finally the endoscopic examination showed clearly that the chest tube was in the stomach. The reason was that we restored two-lung breathing mode after the closure of the incision during the operation, and the re-expanded left lung distorted the tube. On the other hand, we made the anastomosis above the aortic arch, and then fastened the stomach into the esophageal bed by hand-sutured gastric chorion with pleura to lessen the tension. The fastened stomach provided a fastened point to suffer the stimulation from the distorted chest tube. Finally, it seemed too early for the patient to take fluidity, when his gastrointestinal function had not recovered, gastric filling and expanding reduced the intra-thoracic space. Meanwhile, a misleading education made the patient cough incorrectly, persistent and severe cough might be the original motivation of chest tube insertion. As noted above, inexperienced operation skill was a basic factor, the variated chest tube was a key factor, and lasting cough was a motivational factor, these three factors influenced each other and occurred together to lead to this rare complication. Therefore, we should take preventions from three aspects: First of all, surgeons should be cautious when taking some actions during the operation, for instance, perform more gently during the operation, and do not suture too close to the gastric wall to avoid mechanical injury of the stomach; make sure that the acus has penetrated the entire layer when taking anastomosis; do not introduce the anvil of the stapler into the lumen of esophagus roughly; keep moderate pressure for about 8–10 seconds before fire the stapler; do not suture too closely to the anastomatic nails; pay attention to the strength when tying sutures over the anastomosis so as to avoid enlarging the eyelets or worsening the gastric blood-supply; fasten the stomach into the esophageal bed when make a supra-aortic arch anastomosis; restore two-lung breathing mode before close the incision to prevent the placed chest tube from position changing. Additionally, for those patients with poor nutrition, providing life support before operation and taking the management of gastric tube, chest tube, duodenal feeding tube therapy after operation are necessary,6 and patient who has been just stopped gastric decompression, should not be allowed to take food immediately so as to avoid complications caused by gastric expanding. Furthermore, surgeons should educate their patients about the correct way of cough, and use some medicine if necessary, to avoid lasting and severe cough postoperatively. Once the chest tube inserted into the stomach, intragastric content would be found in the water-sealed bottle, so we could diagnose easily through an endoscopic examination. In this case, the patient's symptom was not very emergent and severe so that it seemed would bring severe trauma if a re-operation was applied immediately, moreover, pus and digestive juice was all assembling at the place of fistula, undoubtedly re-operation would confront many difficulties. Consequently, we chose a conservative therapy: remained the chest tubes stay in the stomach, and added vacuum pressure for drainage so as to re-expand the lung, form conglutination, eliminate dead cavities, and placed gastric tube all along for gastric decompression, kept duodenal feeding tube for life support. We examined the condition of fistula by antegrade esophagography and retrograde fistulography of meglucamine diatrizoate, and then pulled out the chest tube from the stomach little by little according to the drainage volume when confirmed that the fistula had recovered. The patient finally was discharged healthily. Acknowledgement: This paper was amended by Abha Patel, a medical student in Upenn, USA.

Abstract:Endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive and safe technique which is universally accepted for the mediastinum and/or hilum lymph node biopsy. Severe infectious complications following EBUS-TBNA were occasional, but sometimes life-threatening.[1] Two patients with severe mediastinal abscess after EBUS-TBNA were treated successfully with surgical drainage in our department, and we reported here to improve our clinical vigilance to this disease. A 59-year-old Chinese man experienced chest pain combined with a cough for about 4 months. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in other hospital and showed right hilum expansion and mediastinum lymph node enlargement. EBUS-TBNA (UC260FW, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was performed to puncture the right tracheobronchial lymph node (#4R) under pharynx nasalis local anesthesia with lidocaine on July 03, 2015. Moreover, this patient was pathologically diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma through using EBUS-TBNA specimens [Figure 1a].Figure 1: (a) Histopathology of the biopsied specimen, pathological diagnosis was lung adenocarcinoma (H&E staining, original magnification ×200); (b and c) computed tomography imaging of mediastinal abscess in case 1, performed on 5 days of EBUS-TBNA, showed an enlargement of the right tracheobronchial lymph node, with some air-like low-density shadow in it (red arrow), and a small amount of pericardial effusion (white arrow); (d) computed tomography imaging of mediastinal abscess in case 2, performed on 25 days of EBUS-TBNA, showed a cystic mass in posterior mediastinum (red arrow), moderate pericardial effusion (white arrow), and bilateral pleural effusion. EBUS-TBNA: Endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration.Three days after EBUS examination (July 06, 2015), the patient developed a high fever, increased the degree of cough and chest pain. He was admitted to our department. Blood examination showed that white blood cell count (WBC) was normal with the increased ratio of neutrophils, and C reactive protein (CRP) was increased. Echocardiographic showed a little pericardial effusion. Chest CT (July 08, 2015) showed an enlargement of the right tracheobronchial lymph node, with some air-like low-density shadow in it [Figure 1b], and a small amount of pericardial effusion [Figure 1c]. We then diagnosed him with possible mediastinal infection because of a patient with suspicious lymph node abscess and fever plus increased CRP level. Moxifloxacin was used as initial antibiotics to treat the infection, but high fever persisted. The 7th day after admission (July 10, 2015), the patient's blood pressure dropped off to 67/43 mmHg even after resuscitation with adequate fluid infusion. Echocardiography was performed and showed high amount of pericardial effusion. Then, septic shock induced by mediastinal abscess or pericardial tamponade was considered. Antibiotics in combinations using intravenous imipenem and teicoplanin were prescribed and emergent pericardial fenestration was performed under general anesthesia. About 800 ml of pus was drained from the pericardial cavities. Antibiotics were continued to use for about 4 weeks after the operation. The body temperature was gradually decreased to normal, and the inflammation indexes such as CRP and WBC decreased within normal values; reexamination on echocardiography showed no pericardial effusion existing; chest CT (August 13, 2015) showed an enlargement of the right tracheobronchial lymph node without air-like low-density shadow, a few amount of pericardial effusion and no pleural effusion; the patient was discharged; and one month later, he received anti-cancer chemotherapy. The second patient was a 52-year-old Chinese man who denied any chronic disease histories. In his yearly routine medical examination, chest CT (August 04, 2016) revealed a cystic mass in the posterior mediastinum. EBUS-TBNA was performed to puncture the subcarinal lymph node (#7) on August 17, 2016. Pathological examination of EBUS-TBNA specimens showed some cellulose-like degeneration materials and no malignant or granulomatous findings. The diagnosis was mediastinal cysts. The patients experienced chest pain, a slight fever, and had an episode of syncope after 25 days from the EBUS-TBNA (August 29, 2016). He returned to our hospital and was admitted in cardiological care unit with initially diagnosis of the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Blood examinations showed us increased WBC, CRP, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Echocardiography showed moderate pericardial effusion. Chest CT (August 30, 2016) demonstrated a mass in posterior mediastinum with moderate pericardial effusion and bilateral pleural effusion [Figure 1d]. Based on the above symptoms and examinations, acute pericarditis and mediastinal abscess were considered. Under general anesthesia and extracorporeal circulation, pericardial fenestration was performed using thoracoscopy and about 800 ml of pus was drained. Intravenous cefoperazone sodium was administered for one more week after the operation, and chest CT (September 06, 2016) was rerun and demonstrated a cystic mass in posterior mediastinum without pericardial and bilateral pleural effusion. The patient recovered and discharged after then. Infectious complications (mediastinitis, pneumonia, pericarditis, cyst infection, and sepsis) after EBUS-TBNA were rare with the incidence of 0.19%, among them, mediastinitis was accounted for 0.10% of these cases.[2] Symptoms of mediastinal abscess were nonspecific including fever, new productive cough, chest pain, hemoptysis, shortness of breath, and arrhythmia. Differential diagnosis should rule out, including ACS. In some cases, the symptoms manifested relatively late even 60 days after manipulation of EBUS-TBNA.[3] Clinical consciousness and awareness of observing the signs of infection were important to diagnose this infrequent complication after the operation. Blood examination often indicated an inflammatory process with elevated WBC, CRP, and ESR. Echocardiography and chest CT showing enlargement of lymph node with an inner low-density shadow and pericardial effusions could provide key clues for the diagnosis of mediastinal infection. Previous studies reported that the most common bacteria identified in mediastinal abscess were of oropharyngeal origin, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Actinomyces, hemolytic Streptococcus, and Streptococcus intermedius, suggesting that the translocation of oral and nasopharyngeal bacteria to deep mediastinal tissues through the transbronchial or transtracheal passage of the needle were the most possible causes of mediastinitis or mediastinal abscess.[4] In addition, the infection may also be caused by bacteremia spread through the punctured wound. When the puncture site was necrotic or cystic, blood flow was slight that was convenient for bacteremia colonization and dissemination.[5] Therefore, ensuring with the right location of the needle tip was very important. Further investigation should be carried out to investigate whether prophylactic antibiotic should be routinely prescribed after EBUS-TBNA. Mortality associated severe infectious complications have been reported.[1] Indeed, in our two patients, hypotension had occurred due to septic shock or pericardial tamponade in one case, and an episode of syncope occurred in another. Even broad-spectrum antibiotics were administrated; surgical drainages were more effective to control the infections. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570058), Jiangsu Provincial Medical Talent, Jiangsu Social Development Project (BE2017604, ZDRCA2016058). Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Suprasternal Notch Needle Decompression to Treat Severe Pneumomediastinum.

The Chest Tube Inserted into the Stomach after a Transthoracic Operation for Esophageal Cancer: Case Report

Use of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube for treating mediastinitis caused by insertion of an esophageal self-expanding metal stent

Perforated gastric ulcer causing mediastinal emphysema: A case report

Emergency nursing of a patient undergoing emergency thoracotomy for intracardiac mental foreign body removal

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors of the esophagogastric junction originating from the muscularis propria layer: a feasibility study (with videos)

Massive subcutaneous emphysema and bilateral tension pneumothorax following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia: A case report

A novel case of simultaneous tracheal stenting and endobronchial valve (EBV) deployment for tracheal stenosis and persistent air leak guided by an endobronchial collateral ventilation assessment system and digital chest drain in malignant esophageal carcinoma

Emergency stent implantation for acute dyspnea caused by severe tracheal stenosis

Severe Mediastinal Abscess after Endobronchial Ultrasound with Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

A Case of Massive Subcutaneous Emphysema and Pneumomediastinum Due to Dehiscence of Stoma After Emergent Tracheostomy

Unconventional surgery for thoracic esophageal rupture with empyema and mediastinitis: a case report and literature review

Peroral endoscopic mediastinal tunneling myotomy for esophageal achalasia: the first case treated in mediastinal tunnel

Transoesophageal Endoscopic Removal of a Benign Mediastinal Tumour: a New Field for Endotherapy?

Safety and Efficacy of Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Septum Division for Epiphrenic Diverticula

EMERGENCY ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL PERFORATION FOLLOWING BALLOON DILATION DUE TO STENOSIS POST-ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A CASE REPORT

Endobronchial Closure for Peripheral Pulmonary Air Leakage

1069 TRANSESOPHAGEAL NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMENAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY FOR A RARE CASE OF SCHWANNOMA IN THE MEDIASTINUM: A NOVEL ROUTE FOR MEDIASTINAL SURGERY

Management of an Esophagopleural Fistula after Resection of Giant Submucosal Tumor of the Cardia

Kill Two Birds with One Stone: One Submucosal Tunnel for Achalasia Combined with Large Epiphrenic Diverticulum

A case of early esophageal cancer with pharyngeal stenosis treated by endoscopic submucosal multi-tunnel dissection using an ultra-thin endoscope