Lack of effects of HER-2/neu on prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Jun Han,Qing-Yang Meng,Xiao Liu,Qiu-Lei Xi,Qiu-Lin Zhuang,Guo-Hao Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5551
2014-01-01
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Abstract:Background: The prognostic value of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2/neu) for survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is still ambiguous. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to evaluate its prognostic significance. Materials and Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for published literature investigating associations between HER-2/neu status and overall survival of patients with CRC. A meta-analysis was performed using a DerSimonian-Laird model and publication bias was investigated by Begg's and Egger's tests. Subgroup analysis was also conducted according to the study design type, study quality score, cut-off value for HER-2/neu overexpression, publication region, patient number and publication year. Results: A total of 17 eligible studies involving 2,347 patients were identified for this meta-analysis. The combined hazard ratio (HR) was 1.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.79), suggesting that HER-2/neu overexpression was not significantly associated with overall survival of patients with CRC. However, subgroup analysis revealed that HER-2/neu overexpression had an unfavorable impact on survival when the analysis was restricted to subgroups of study quality score <= 5 (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.17-2.10), Asian patients (HR=1.74, 95% CI: 1.22-2.49), patient number <= 106 (HR=1.57, 95% CI: 1.01-2.44), publication year before 2003 (HR=1.59, 95% CI: 1.02-2.49), and prospectively designed study (HR=3.62, 95% CI: 1.42-9.24). The effect disappeared in subgroups of study quality scores > 5 (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.33-1.44), non Asian patients (HR=1.14, 95% CI: 0.77-1.70), patients' number > 106 (HR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.67-1.72), publication year after 2003 (HR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.76-1.69), and retrospectively designed study (HR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.89-1.67). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests that HER-2/neu overexpression might not be a significantly prognostic indicator for patients with CRC. Further studies are required to confirm these results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?