Abstract:As a physical assessment of the sustainability of the China society, presented in this paper is an exergy-based systems account for resources use and environmental emissions of the China society in 2006 as the most recent year with statistics availability. Exergy analysis is applied to elucidate the resources flows from the natural environment into the society, between other countries or regions and the society, between the sectors of the society, and the emissions outflows into the natural environment from different sectors. For the China society broken down into seven sectors (i.e., extraction, conversion, agriculture, industry, transportation, tertiary and households) as one of the most complicated cases, systems account of environmental emissions as greenhouse gases and "three wastes" is carried out for the first time, combined with an updated resources account. The total societal exergy consumption amounts to 101.1 EJ, of which 93.6% is due to resources use accounted as 94.6 EJ, of which 23.2% is by the industry sector, 22.8% by conversion, 20.4% by households, 12.3% by agriculture, 9.0% by tertiary, 6.9% by extraction and 5.4% by transport, and 6.4% due to environmental emissions accounted as 6481.611, including greenhouse gas emissions of 5706.1 PJ, with the highly remarkable fraction of 49.05% from CH4 of the same importance as 50.91% from CO2 and only 0.04% from N2O, and "three wastes" emissions of only 775.5 PJ. The extraction sector is shown as the leading emitter with 32.6% of the total emissions, followed by the industry with 20.0%, agriculture with 17.3%, and conversion sector with 16.8%. To characterize the network performance in context of environmental resources from a systems ecological perspective, exergy-based ecological efficiency and resources conversion coefficient are found as 88.8% and 91.3% for the extraction sector, 29.0% and 30.0% for the conversion sector, 31.5% and 33.5% for the agriculture sector, 34.8% and 36.1% for the industry sector, 16.3% and 17.3% for the transportation sector. 38.4% and 38.5% for the tertiary sector, and only 1.3% and 1.3% for the households sector, respectively. Comparisons with other societies and with China society in previous years are made to further illustrate the physical sustainability of the societal system on the international and development horizons. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Ecological Accounting Based on Extended Exergy: a Sustainability Perspective.

Ecological Accounting for China Based on Extended Exergy

Extended Exergy-Based Ecological Accounting of China During 2000-2007

A Framework of Pollution-Based Environmental and Economic Accounting for China

Ecological accounting of the Chinese society 2012–2020 based on extended exergy

Study on China's Gross Economic-ecological Product Accounting in 2015

An Improved Extended Exergy Accounting Method for Assessing the Sustainability of the Chinese Society

Exergy Based Ecological Footprint Accounting for China

Extended Exergy-Based Fossil Fuels Resource Accounting of China During 1980–2007

Exergy-based resource accounting for China

Constructing a Network of the Social-Economic Consumption System of China Using Extended Exergy Analysis

Exergy-based Systems Account of National Resource Utilization: China 2012

Physical Sustainability Assessment for the China Society: Exergy-Based Systems Account for Resources Use and Environmental Emissions

Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003

Exergy-based sustainability evaluation of a wind power generation system

Modified Ecological Footprint Accounting and Analysis Based on Embodied Exergy—a Case Study of the Chinese Society 1981–2001

Exergy Analysis of Embodied Natural Resources Use in China and Its Driving Factors: from a Production Perspective

Extended-exergy analysis of the Chinese society

Exergetic assessment for ecological economic system: Chinese agriculture

Identifying the environmental support and constraints to the Chinese economic growth-An application of the Emergy Accounting method

Resource exergy analysis of the Chinese society in 2017