Abstract:OBJECTIVES:: This meta-analysis sought to determine whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) improves clinical and resource outcomes compared with thoracotomy (OPEN) in adults undergoing lobectomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. METHODS:: A comprehensive search was undertaken to identify all randomized (RCT) and nonrandomized (non-RCT) controlled trials comparing VATS with OPEN thoracotomy available up to April 2007. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included any other reported clinical outcome and resource utilization. Odds ratios (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD), or standardized mean differences (SMD), and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were analyzed as appropriate. RESULTS:: Baseline prognosis was more favorable for VATS (more females, smaller tumor size, less advanced stage, histology associated with peripheral location and with more indolent disease) than for OPEN in non-RCTs, but not RCT. Postoperative complications were significantly reduced in the VATS group compared with OPEN surgery when both RCT and non-RCT were considered in aggregate (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.70). Although overall blood loss was significantly reduced with VATS compared with OPEN (-80 mL, 95% CI -110 to -50 mL), the incidence of excessive blood loss (generally defined as >500 mL) and incidence of re-exploration for bleeding was not significantly reduced. Pain measured via visual analog scales (10-point VAS) was significantly reduced by <1 point on day 1, by >2 points at 1 week, and by <1 point at week 2 to 4. Similarly, analgesia requirements were significantly reduced in the VATS group. Postoperative vital capacity was significantly improved (WMD 20, 95% CI 15-25), and at 1 year was significantly greater for VATS versus OPEN surgery (WMD 7, 95% CI 2-12). The incidence of patients reporting limited activity at 3 months was reduced (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.82), and time to full activity was significantly reduced in the VATS versus OPEN surgery (WMD -1.5, 95% CI -2.1 to -0.9). Overall patient-reported physical function scores did not differ between groups at 3 years follow-up. Hospital length of stay was significantly reduced by 2.6 days despite increased 16 minutes of operating time for VATS versus OPEN. The incidence of cancer recurrence (local or distal) was not significantly different, but chemotherapy delays were significantly reduced for VATS versus OPEN (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.38). The need for chemotherapy reduction was also decreased (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.87), and the number of patients who did not receive at least 75% of their planned chemotherapy without delays were reduced (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.93). The risk of death was not significantly reduced when RCTs were considered alone; however, when non-RCTs (n = 18) were included, the risk of death at 1 to 5 years was significantly reduced (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.94; P = 0.02) for VATS versus OPEN. Stage-specific survival to 5 years was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS:: This meta-analysis suggests that there may be some short term, and possibly even long-term, advantages to performing lung resections with VATS techniques rather than through conventional thoracotomy. Overall, VATS for lobectomy may reduce acute and chronic pain, perioperative morbidity, and improve delivery of adjuvant therapies, without a decrease in stage specific long-term survival. However, the results are largely dependent on non-RCTs, and future adequately powered randomized trials with long-term follow-up are encouraged.

Risk Factors For Major Adverse Events Of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy For Lung Cancer

The Long-Term Impact of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy: a Series of Consecutive 300 Patients and a 3-year Follow-up

Severe Intraoperative Complications During VATS Lobectomy Compared with Thoracotomy Lobectomy for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The Early Outcome of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Primary Lung Carcinoma

Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early lung cancer: retrospective study of 518 cases

Perioperative Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Open Lobectomy for Pt1-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in China: a Multi-Center Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Risk factors for conversion to thoracotomy in patients with lung cancer undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A meta-analysis

Comparing the Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Open Thoracotomy in Sleeve Lobectomy for the Treatment of Central-Type Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Common Causes of Conversion of VATS During Operation for 248 Non-small Cell Lung Cancers

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Sleeve Lobectomy with Bronchoplasty

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Posterior Mediastinal Tumors

Clinical Outcomes Following an Initial Experience with a Novel Powered Vascular Stapler in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomies: Results of a Chinese Multi-Center Study

The long-term impact of postoperative pulmonary complication after resection of non-small cell lung cancer

Analysis of Clinical Application of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: The Learning Curve

Video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy:experience with 256 consecutive patients

Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy during lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer have equivalent oncological outcomes: A single-center experience of 212 consecutive resections.

[Analysis of Prolonged Hospitalizations (longer Than 7 Days): 115 Lung Cancer Patients after Video Assistant Thoracic Surgery (VATS)].

Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for clinical stage Ⅰ / Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center comparative study