Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of the Simultaneous three scopes combined surgery [laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)+ choledochoscopy exploration + choledochectomy and removal of the common bile duct + primary suture of the common bile duct + endoscopic guided nasobiliary duct placement] and staged two scopes surgery[endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with LC] in the treatment of choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis.Methods:From January 2018 to June 2020, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 83 patients with choledocholithiasis and choledocholithiasis, who underwent minimally invasive treatment in our center. According to the different surgical procedures, the patients were divided into three-mirror group ( n=42) and two-mirror group ( n=41). All patients in the three-mirror group underwent three-scopy combined surgery. The patients in two-mirror group received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this study we compared the relevant clinical indicators of the two groups, in terms of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, one-time stone clearance rate, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative defecation time, total hospitalization cost, incidence of postoperative acute pancreatitis, postoperative stone recurrence rate, incidence of postoperative cholangitis, and incidence of postoperative biliary fistula, total hospitalization time, postoperative bile duct stricture rate. Use SPSS 26.0 software to statistically analyze various indexes such as intraoperative, postoperative, follow-up, etc. Normally distributed measurement data were described by the mean±standard deviation ( Mean± SD), the comparison between groups was by t test, and measurement data with skewed distribution were destribed as M( P25, P75), Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using nonparametric test. The comparison of count data between groups was by the chi-square test. Results:No death was observed in both two groups. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, one-time stone clearance rate, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative defecation time of the three-mirror groupwere (167.98±47.37) min, 50(50, 100) mL, 100%(42/42), (2.10±0.76) days, 3(3, 4) days, the two-mirror group were (143.80±34.47) min, 50(50, 50) mL, 85.4%(35/41), (1.53±0.99) days and 2(1, 3) days. Compared with the two groups, the three-mirror group was higher than the two-mirror group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The total hospitalization expenses, postoperative acute pancreatitis incidence, and postoperative calculus recurrence rate in the three-mirror group were (3.46±0.77) ten thousand yuan, 0(0/42), 2.38%(1/42), the two-mirror group were (4.22±1.50) ten thousand yuan, 9.8%(4/41), 19.5%(8/41). Compared with the two groups, the three-mirror group was lower than the two-mirror group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). No postoperative cholangitis or biliary fistula occurred in the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the total hospital stay and incidence of postoperative bile duct stenosis between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:For choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis patients, simultaneous three-scopes combined surgery and elective LC after ERCP are safe and effective, and each has its own advantages. It should be selected reasonably according to the patient′s condition and combined with the technical advantages of the treatment team.

Comparative Quality of Life Study Between Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Surgical Choledochotomy

Comparison Of Quality Of Life Between Two Biliary Drainage Procedures In Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration

The comparative analysis between two methods for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis

Comparison of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparoscopic Exploration of the Common Bile Duct for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Patients' Quality of Life after Laparoscopic or Open Cholecystectomy.

Intraoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

[Life quality of patients after cholecystectomy].

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute cholangitis due to cholecystocholedocholithiasis

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined with Intraoperative Cholangiography and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis

Management of Choledocholithiasis: Comparison Between Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Intraoperative Endoscopic Sphincterotomy

Investigation on the life quality of post-operative patients with cholelithiasis

Contrast Study on Choledochalithiasis Therapy Using Endoscopic Versus Open Surgical Procedure

Clinical analysis of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

The Contrasting Analysis Between EST Combined with LC and Open Proceduce in Treating Cholecystoc-Holedocholithiasis

Clinical Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Fiberoptic Choledochoscopy versus Conventional Open Surgery for Gallbladder Stones Complicated with Common Bile Duct Stones

Laparoscopic Versus Endoscopic Management of Choledocholithiasis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-analysis

Long-Term Prognosis of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis in Chinese Population

Research on the Long-term Quality of Life of Patients with Cholelithiasis and Gallbladder Polyps after Operation

Comparison of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Open Common Bile Duct Exploration in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones

Health Economics Comparison between Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Laparotomy for Primary Common Bile Duct Stones

Comparative study of simultaneous three scopes surgery and staged two scopes surgery in the treatment of choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis