Abstract:BACKGROUND: Engaging patients in the delivery of health care has the potential to improve health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Patient portals may enhance patient engagement by enabling patients to access their electronic medical records (EMRs) and facilitating secure patient-provider communication.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review literature describing patient portals tethered to an EMR in inpatient settings, their role in patient engagement, and their impact on health care delivery in order to identify factors and best practices for successful implementation of this technology and areas that require further research.METHODS: A systematic search for articles in the PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted using keywords associated with patient engagement, electronic health records, and patient portals and their respective subject headings in each database. Articles for inclusion were evaluated for quality using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) for systematic review articles and the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs for empirical studies. Included studies were categorized by their focus on input factors (eg, portal design), process factors (eg, portal use), and output factors (eg, benefits) and by the valence of their findings regarding patient portals (ie, positive, negative, or mixed).RESULTS: The systematic search identified 58 articles for inclusion. The inputs category was addressed by 40 articles, while the processes and outputs categories were addressed by 36 and 46 articles, respectively: 47 articles addressed multiple themes across the three categories, and 11 addressed only a single theme. Nineteen articles had high- to very high-quality, 21 had medium quality, and 18 had low- to very low-quality. Findings in the inputs category showed wide-ranging portal designs; patients' privacy concerns and lack of encouragement from providers were among portal adoption barriers while information access and patient-provider communication were among facilitators. Several methods were used to train portal users with varying success. In the processes category, sociodemographic characteristics and medical conditions of patients were predictors of portal use; some patients wanted unlimited access to their EMRs, personalized health education, and nonclinical information; and patients were keen to use portals for communicating with their health care teams. In the outputs category, some but not all studies found patient portals improved patient engagement; patients perceived some portal functions as inadequate but others as useful; patients and staff thought portals may improve patient care but could cause anxiety in some patients; and portals improved patient safety, adherence to medications, and patient-provider communication but had no impact on objective health outcomes.CONCLUSIONS: While the evidence is currently immature, patient portals have demonstrated benefit by enabling the discovery of medical errors, improving adherence to medications, and providing patient-provider communication, etc. High-quality studies are needed to fully understand, improve, and evaluate their impact.

Predictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer.

Factors Associated with Uptake of Patient Portals at a Federally Qualified Health Care Center

Disparities in Use of Patient Portals Among Adults in Family Medicine

Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Usage at a Large Pediatric Academic Institution

Disparities in Pediatric Patient Portal Activation and Feature Use.

Perceptions of Quality of Care Among Users of a Web-Based Patient Portal: Cross-sectional Survey Analysis

Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review

Growth Dynamics of Patient-Provider Internet Communication: Trend Analysis Using the Health Information National Trends Survey (2003 to 2013)

Bridging the Digital Health Divide: Characterizing Patient Portal Users and Nonusers in the U.S

Health information and technology engagement for clinical research and healthcare purposes (HITECH) survey of patients with a history of cancer.

Individual-Level Digital Determinants of Health and Technology Acceptance of Patient Portals: Cross-Sectional Assessment

Digital Literacy at an Urban Cancer Center: Implications for Technology Use and Vulnerable Patients

Disparities and Determinants of Online Medical Record Access among Cancer Survivors

eHealth in Modern Patient-Caregiver Communication: High Rate of Acceptance Among Physicians for Additional Support of Breast Cancer Patients During Long-Term Therapy

Engagement of patients with cancer with digital health platforms: An age-based analysis.

Understanding Patient Questions about Their Medical Records in an Online Health Forum: Opportunity for Patient Portal Design.

Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users

Testing a Model of Patient Portal Use in Adult Patients

Navigating cancer care through digital dialogue: Analyzing key phrases shared by patients in real-time exchange messages using an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM).

Patient Portals Fail to Collect Structured Information About Who Else is Involved in a Person's Care

Cancer-Related Internet Use and Its Association With Patient Decision Making and Trust in Physicians Among Patients in an Early Drug Development Clinic: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Observational Study