Bioremediation of endosulfan in laboratory-scale constructed wetlands: effect of bioaugmentation and biostimulation

Congcong Zhao,HuiJun Xie,Yang Mu,Xiaoli Xu,Jian Zhang,Cui Liu,Shuang Liang,Huu Hao Ngo,Wenshan Guo,Jingtao Xu,Qian Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3107-1
2014-01-01
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
Abstract:Bioremediation is widely used in organic pollutants disposal. However, very little has been known on its application in constructed wetlands contaminated with organochlorine pesticide, endosulfan in particular. To evaluate the effect of bioremediation on endosulfan removal and clarify the fate, bioaugmentation and biostimulation were studied in laboratory-scale vertical-flow constructed wetlands. After 20 days’ experiment, endosulfan isomers removal efficiencies were increased to 89.24–97.62 % through bioremediation. In bacteria bioaugmentation (E-in) and sucrose biostimulation (E-C), peak concentrations of endosulfan in sediment were reduced by 31.02–76.77 %, and plant absorption were 347.45–576.65 μg kg −1 . By contrast, plant absorption in KH 2 PO 4 biostimulation (E-P) was increased to 811.64 and 1,067.68 μg kg −1 . Degradation process was probably promoted in E-in and E-C, while plant absorption was enhanced in E-P. Consequently, E-in and E-C were effective for endosulfan removal in constructed wetlands, while adding KH 2 PO 4 had potential to cause air pollution. Additionally, combined bioremediation was not recommended.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?