Abstract:G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell‐surface receptors and are known to canonically signal through two main effector proteins: G proteins and β‐arrestins. Biased agonism at GPCRs refers to the functional selectivity of a ligand towards certain signaling pathways over others. In addition to biased agonists, there are various other sources of bias that influence GPCR signaling, such as receptor and location bias, which affect the downstream pathways of receptor activation, leading to disproportionate levels of signaling between the G protein and β‐arrestin pathway. One of the mechanisms underlying this signaling bias is the phosphorylation barcode hypothesis which states that ligand induced receptor phosphorylation promotes differential engagement with downstream transducers. Across the entire GPCR superfamily, GPCR kinases (GRKs) are known to be primarily responsible for receptor phosphorylation. Of the seven known isoforms in the GRK family, GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6 are expressed ubiquitously, whereas GRK1 and GRK7 are mainly found in the eye while GRK4 is predominantly located in the testes. Although there is supportive evidence demonstrating that differential phosphorylation promotes biased signaling, there is relatively little known about the role of GRKs in directing GPCR functional selectivity. To study the role of GRKs in biased signaling, we studied the GPCR CXCR3, a chemokine receptor primarily involved in leukocyte migration, which has three endogenous biased ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, and two synthetic biased ligands, VUF10661 and VUF11418. We found that, following ligand stimulation, GRK2 and GRK3 are recruited to CXCR3, with VUF10661 and CXCL11 being the most efficacious ligands. However, we also observed that GRK3 and GRK5 are able to traffic to endosomes following ligand stimulation with VUF10661, even though all ligands are able to promote receptor internalization. Given biased engagement of the GRKs observed at both the receptor and in endosomes, we next studied the functional consequences of ligand and location bias by creating GRK 2, 3, 5 and 6 constructs that are specifically targeted to the plasma membrane or the endosome. Using GRK2/3/5/6 KO cells, we determined that localization of the GRKs impacts receptor internalization, ERK activity, and transcription in a ligand specific manner. Together, we observed that the endogenous and synthetic ligands of CXCR3 demonstrate biased engagement of the GRKs at different subcellular locations and highlight the functional significance of these findings on downstream receptor signaling. These data provide evidence that the functional selectivity of biased signaling extends beyond β‐arrestins and G‐proteins to other effector proteins that interact with GPCRs.

Biased Ligand Bonds to Make Right Calls—laboratory of Signal Transduction Reveals Molecular Mechanism for Functional Selectivity of GPCR

Two naturally occurring mutations of human GPR103 define distinct G protein selection bias

[Research Progress in Signal Bias of G Protein-Coupled Receptor and Its Mechanism].

Molecular mechanism of biased signaling in a prototypical G protein–coupled receptor

Advances in Receptor Conformation Research: the Quest for Functionally Selective Conformations Focusing on the Β2-Adrenoceptor.

Structure and dynamics determine G protein coupling specificity at a class A GPCR

Identification and mechanism of G protein-biased ligands for chemokine receptor CCR1

Signalling bias in new drug discovery: detection, quantification and therapeutic impact

Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors

Molecular Determinant Underlying Selective Coupling of Primary G-Protein by Class A GPCRs

Functional selectivity and dualsteric/bitopic GPCR targeting

Ligand-biased regulation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-dependent signal transduction in GPCR control of pituitary hormone release

Structural Insights into M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling Bias Between Gαq and Β-Arrestin Through BRET Assays and Molecular Docking.

Discovery of GPCR ligands for probing signal transduction pathways

GPCR Structure and Function Relationship: Identification of a Biased Apelin Receptor Mutant.

Location Bias of G Protein‐Coupled Receptor Kinases Promotes Biased Signaling at CXCR3

Design of allosteric modulators that change GPCR G protein subtype selectivity

Functional profiling of the G protein-coupled receptor C3aR1 reveals ligand-mediated biased agonism

Flavors of GPCR signaling bias

Biased signaling due to oligomerization of the G protein-coupled platelet-activating factor receptor

Molecular Basis of Class B GPCR Selectivity for the Neuropeptides PACAP and VIP