Optimal Target Range for Blood Glucose in Hyperglycaemic Patients in a Neurocritical Care Unit.

Yi-Jing Guo,Yi Zhou,Sheng-Yi Zhang,Qiong Wei,Yan Huang,Wen-Qing Xia,Shao-Hua Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164114530580
2014-01-01
Abstract:Background: Hyperglycaemia is common among patients with critical neurological injury, even if they have no history of diabetes. The optimal target range for normalizing their blood glucose is unknown. Methods: Retrospective data were extracted from 890 hyperglycaemic individuals (glucose > 200 mg/dL) admitted to neuroscience critical care unit (NCCU) and these patients were divided into two groups: intensive glucose control group with target glucose of < 140 mg/dL achieved and moderate control with glucose levels 140-180 mg/dL. The groups were also stratified according to the hyperglycaemia type (pre-existing diabetes or stress-related). We defined the primary endpoint as death from any cause during NCCU admission. Results: In NCCU, tighter control of blood glucose at ≤ 140 mg/dL was associated with increased, mortality of individuals with pre-existing diabetes compared with moderate control [29 of 310 patients (9.4%) vs 15 of 304 patients (4.9%), p = 0.034]. Patient age [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–1.19; p < 0.001], level of glycated haemoglobin (adjusted OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.04–1.48; p = 0.017) and hypoglycaemia (adjusted OR = 10.3; 95% CI = 2.92–36.6; p < 0.001) were positively associated with higher mortality. Death rate was lower among stress-related hyperglycaemic patients with tighter glucose controlled at ≤ 140 mg/dL [6 of 140 patients (4.3%) vs 15 of 136 patients (11.0%), p = 0.035]. Conclusion: A differential association is evident between glucose levels and mortality in diabetes and stress-related hyperglycaemia patients. However, given the observational nature of our work, no clinical recommendations can be given and prospective studies are required to further investigate these findings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?