Cooperative Catalysis Through Noncovalent Interactions.
Weijun Tang,Steven Johnston,Jonathan A. Iggo,Neil G. Berry,Marie Phelan,Luyun Lian,John Bacsa,Jianliang Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208774
2013-01-01
Angewandte Chemie
Abstract:Noncovalent interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, electrostatic, p–p, CH–p, and hydrophobic forces, play an essential role in the action of nature s catalysts, enzymes. In the last decade these interactions have been successfully exploited in organocatalysis with small organic molecules. In contrast, such interactions have rarely been studied in the wellestablished area of organometallic catalysis, where electronic interactions through covalent bonding and steric effects imposed by bound ligands dictate the activity and selectivity of a metal catalyst. An interesting question is: What happens when an organocatalyst meets an organometallic catalyst? This unification has already created an exciting new space for both fields: cooperative catalysis, where reactants are activated simultaneously by both types of catalyst, thereby enabling reactivity and selectivity patterns inaccessible within each field alone. However, the mechanisms by which the two catalysts cooperatively effect the catalysis remain to be delineated. We recently found that combining an achiral iridium catalyst with a chiral phosphoric acid allows for highly enantioselective hydrogenation of imines (Scheme 1). To gain insight into the mechanism of this metal–organo cooperative catalysis, we studied the catalytic system with a range of techniques, including high pressure 2D-NMR spectroscopy, diffusion measurements, and NOEconstrained computation. Herein we report our findings. To evaluate the mechanism, a simplified achiral complex C was used, which leads to [C][A ] upon mixing, in situ or ex situ, with the chiral phosphoric acid HA through protonation at the amido nitrogen (Scheme 1). In the asymmetric hydrogenation of the model ketimine 1a, [C][A ] afforded 95% ee and full conversion. On the basis of related studies, the hydrogenation can be broadly explained by the catalytic cycle shown in Scheme 1, that is, [C][A ] activates H2 to give the hydride D and protonated 1a, which forms an ion pair with the phosphate affording [1a][A ]; hydride transfer furnishes the amine product 2a while regenerating [C][A ]. Questions pertinent to possible iridium–phosphate cooperation then arise: 1) How does the chiral phosphoric acid induce asymmetry in the hydrogenation? and 2) Does the enantioselectivity result from D being formed enantioselectively from [C][A ], from the phosphate salt [1a][A ], or from interactions involving all three components? We looked first at how the formation of hydride D and its transfer into the substrate are influenced by the chiral acid HA. The studies were carried out in CH2Cl2 or CD2Cl2 owing to the low solubility of the various metal complexes in toluene. The catalytic hydrogenation is feasible in both solvents, giving a 95% ee in toluene and 85 % ee in CH2Cl2 in the case of hydrogenation of 1a with C and HA under the conditions given in Scheme 1. The solution NMR studies show that the ionic complex [C][A ] is formed instantly on protonation of C (0.05 mmol) with one equivalent HA in CD2Cl2 (0.5 mL). Under H2 pressure (> 1 bar), proton transfer from a [C]–H2 dihydrogen intermediate (not observed) to 1a converts [C] into the hydride D and affords the salt [1a] [A ]. Formation of D took place instantly even at 78 8C, and it is observed during catalytic turnover, thus indicating that the hydrogenation is rate-limited by the hydride transfer step. Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of imine with achiral C and chiral acid HA (PMP = p-methoxyphenyl, Ar= 2,4,6-triisopropylphenyl, Ts = tosyl, Bn = benzyl).