Iron-mediated Oxidation of Arsenic(iii) by Oxygen and Hydrogen Peroxide: Dispersed Versus Resin-Supported Zero-Valent Iron.

Qiong Du,Lixia Zhou,Shujuan Zhang,Bingcai Pan,Lu Lv,Weiming Zhang,Quanxing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.056
IF: 9.9
2014-01-01
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
Abstract:The goal of this study is to assess the differences in As(III) removal kinetics and mechanisms between dispersed zero-valent iron (d-ZVI) and resin-supported zero-valent iron (D201-ZVI) in the presence of dissolved oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. Experimental results show that As(III) could be removed by all the studied systems (d-ZVI/O-2, d-ZVI/H2O2, D201-ZVI/O-2, D201-ZVI/H2O2). The d-ZVI/H2O2 system was more efficient than D201-ZVI/H2O2 for the oxidation of As(III). Similar trends were observed in O-2 system for both solids. The kinetic behaviors as well as the influence of a hydroxyl radical scavenger (2-propanol) on the oxidation of As(III) at different pH suggest that the oxidation of As(III) in the d-ZVI/O-2 and d-ZVI/H2O2 systems occurred mainly through Fenton-like reactions. The oxidation of As(III) in the D201-ZVI/O-2 and D201-ZVI/H2O2 systems might be expected as follows: As(III) was firstly adsorbed onto the surface of the D201-ZVI, and then oxidation may proceed mainly through a non-Fenton mechanism that directly converts H2O2 into O-2 and H2O. In addition, certain iron oxides in the D201-ZVI could also serve as oxidants for As(Ill) oxidation. The significant differences between the dispersed and supported ZVIs suggest that the supporting matrix interfered in the removal process, which deserves a further investigation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?