Streptomycin Inhibits Electrophysiological Changes Induced by Stretching of Chronically Infarcted Rat Hearts

Jun-xian Cao,Lu Fu,Qian-ping Gao,Rong-sheng Xie,Fan Qu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.b1300297
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate stretch-induced electrophysiological changes in chronically infarcted hearts and the effect of streptomycin (SM) on these changes in vivo . Methods: Sixty Wistar rats were divided randomly into four groups: a control group ( n =15), an SM group ( n =15), a myocardial infarction (MI) group ( n =15), and an MI+SM group ( n =15). Chronic MI was obtained by ligating the left anterior descending branch (LAD) of rat hearts for eight weeks. The in vivo blockade of stretch-activated ion channels (SACs) was achieved by intramuscular injection of SM (180 mg/(kg∙d)) for seven days after operation. The hearts were stretched for 5 s by occlusion of the aortic arch. Suction electrodes were placed on the anterior wall of left ventricle to record the monophasic action potential (MAP). The effect of stretching was examined by assessing the 90% monophasic action potential duration (MAPD 90 ), premature ventricular beats (PVBs), and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Results: The MAPD 90 decreased during stretching in both the control (from (50.27±5.61) ms to (46.27±4.51) ms, P <0.05) and MI groups (from (65.47±6.38) ms to (57.47±5.76 ms), P <0.01). SM inhibited the decrease in MAPD 90 during inflation ((46.27±4.51) ms vs. (49.53±3.52) ms, P <0.05 in normal hearts; (57.47±5.76) ms vs. (61.87±5.33) ms, P <0.05 in MI hearts). The occurrence of PVBs and VT in the MI group increased compared with that in the control group (PVB: 7.93±1.66 vs. 1.80±0.86, P <0.01; VT: 7 vs. 1, P <0.05). SM decreased the occurrence of PVBs in both normal and MI hearts (0.93±0.59 vs. 1.80±0.86 in normal hearts, P <0.05; 5.40±1.18 vs. 7.93±1.66 in MI hearts, P <0.01). Conclusions: Stretch-induced MAPD 90 changes and arrhythmias were observed in chronically infarcted myocardium. The use of SM in vivo decreased the incidence of PVBs but not of VT. This suggests that SACs may be involved in mechanoelectric feedback (MEF), but that there might be other mechanisms involved in causing VT in chronic MI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?