Abstract:Plant-pathogen interactions involve sophisticated action and counteraction strategies from both parties. Plants can recognize pathogen derived molecules, such as conserved pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and effector proteins, and subsequently activate PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI), respectively. However, pathogens can evade such recognitions and suppress host immunity with effectors, causing effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS). The differences among PTI, ETS, and ETI have not been completely understood. Toward a better understanding of PTI, ETS, and ETI, we systematically examined various defense-related phenotypes of Arabidopsis infected with different Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 strains, using the virulence strain DG3 to induce ETS, the avirulence strain DG34 that expresses avrRpm1 (recognized by the resistance protein RPM1) to induce ETI, and HrcC-that lacks the type three secretion system to activate PTI. We found that plants infected with different strains displayed dynamic differences in the accumulation of the defense signaling molecule salicylic acid, expression of the defense marker gene PR1, cell death formation, and accumulation/localization of the reactive oxygen species, H2O2. The differences between PTI, ETS, and ETI are dependent on the doses of the strains used. These data support the quantitative nature of PTI, ETS, and ETI and they also reveal qualitative differences between PTI, ETS, and ETI. Interestingly, we observed the induction of large cells in the infected leaves, most obviously with HrcC-at later infection stages. The enlarged cells have increased DNA content, suggesting a possible activation of endoreplication. Consistent with strong induction of abnormal cell growth by HrcC-, we found that the PTI elicitor flg22 also activates abnormal cell growth, depending on a functional flg22-receptor FLS2. Thus, our study has revealed a comprehensive picture of dynamic changes of defense phenotypes and cell fate determination during Arabidopsis-P. syringae interactions, contributing to a better understanding of plant defense mechanisms.

Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 Mediates Pathogen Resistance and Virulence Function of a Bacterial Effector in Soybean.

Enhanced Disease Susceptibility1 Mediates Pathogen Resistance and Virulence Function of a Bacterial Effector in Soybean1[C][W][OPEN]

Effects of mutations and constitutive overexpression of EDS1 and PAD4 on plant resistance to different types of microbial pathogens

An Important Role of A Bahd Acyl Transferase-Like Protein in Plant Innate Immunity

GmRAR1 and GmSGT1 Are Required for Basal, R Gene–Mediated and Systemic Acquired Resistance in Soybean

A core function of EDS1 with PAD4 is to protect the salicylic acid defense sector in Arabidopsis immunity.

The BZR1-EDS1 module regulates plant growth-defense coordination

EDS1-interacting J protein 1 is an essential negative regulator of plant innate immunity in Arabidopsis

An Oleic Acid-Mediated Pathway Induces Constitutive Defense Signaling and Enhanced Resistance to Multiple Pathogens in Soybean

Island Cotton Enhanced Disease Susceptibility 1 Gene Encoding a Lipase-Like Protein Plays a Crucial Role in Response to Verticillium Dahliae by Regulating the SA Level and H2O2 Accumulation

Arabidopsis Phospholipase Dα1 and Dδ Oppositely Modulate EDS1- and SA-independent Basal Resistance Against Adapted Powdery Mildew.

Cavity surface residues of PAD4 and SAG101 contribute to EDS1 dimer signaling specificity in plant immunity.

The soybean plasma membrane GmDR1 protein conferring broad-spectrum disease and pest resistance regulates several receptor kinases and NLR proteins

Arabidopsis thaliana EDS4 Contributes to Salicylic Acid (SA)-Dependent Expression of Defense Responses: Evidence for Inhibition of Jasmonic Acid Signaling by SA

Dynamics of Defense Responses and Cell Fate Change During Arabidopsis-Pseudomonas Syringae Interactions

Eds1-Mediated Basal Defense and Sa-Signaling Contribute to Post-Invasion Resistance Against Tobacco Powdery Mildew in Arabidopsis

A Phytophthora Capsici Effector Suppresses Plant Immunity Via Interaction with EDS1

Overexpression of a plasma membrane protein generated broad‐spectrum immunity in soybean

Editing of an Effector Gene Promoter Sequence Impacts Plant-Phytophthora Interaction

Ethylene‐responsive factor ERF114 mediates fungal pathogen effector PevD1‐induced disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana

ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1 Repress SALICYLIC ACID INDUCTION DEFICIENT2 Expression to Negatively Regulate Plant Innate Immunity in Arabidopsis.