Validation of Eortc Qlq-Lc43 for Chinese Patients with Lung Cancer

Lei Zhang,Yanjun Su,Yanni Hua,Weiran Liu,Lin Yue,Jinglian Wu,Le Luo,Weidong Lu,Stephanie Mu-Lian Woo,Adam R. Miller,Shumin Xie,Hong Zhu,Chong Pang,Jing Zhang,Changli Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.04.006
IF: 6.081
2014-01-01
Lung Cancer
Abstract:Objectives: To test the validity, reliability and acceptability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 43 (EORTC QLQ-LC43) for Chinese patients with lung cancer.Materials and methods: Patients from Tianjin Cancer Institution and Hospital with lung cancer were enrolled in this study. All were treated in Tianjin Cancer Institution and Hospital from December 2012 to April 2013. All participants self-administered the EORTC QLQ-LC43 and the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). The Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) was performed to evaluate scores. Reliability test of the questionnaires was based on Cronbach's alpha coefficients, Pearson correlation test and Kruskal-Wallis test.Results: This study included 317 inpatients and outpatients. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were >0.70 in all scales of the two questionnaires, except that of cognitive functioning. High correlations were found among the quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, role functioning, dyspnea, and KPS scores (r > 0.40). Mild correlations were discovered among the rest of the items. Dividing the participants into three groups based on the KPS scores showed that QoL and functional scales scores progressively decreased and the symptom items scores progressively increased as KPS scores decreased. All inter-group differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The EORTC QLQ-LC43 is a reliable and valid instrument in patients with lung cancer and is appropriate for measuring the QoL of Chinese patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?