Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Orthodontic brackets can be a significant factor in enamel demineralization due to their complex structure, which makes brushing the teeth difficult and promotes the accumulation of food particles and dental plaque. The fact that metal braces have the highest surface tension and are more likely to cause enamel demineralization, which can result in the development of white spot lesions and enamel caries, is of critical significance to doctors, dentists, and patients. Probiotics have a beneficial effect in preventing and treating oral infectious diseases like tooth decay, gingival disorders, and bad breath. Research has shown that taking probiotics lowers the amount of Streptococcus mutans in the body. There has not been much research done to examine the results of administering a probiotic medication locally. This study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of three separate probiotics in the prevention of S. mutans accumulation in plaque surrounding orthodontic braces.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. The volunteers for each group were chosen using a straightforward random method. The sample size was 160 empirically determined subjects. They were divided as follows: study group 1 received probiotic lozenges (n=40). Study group 2 received probiotic sachets (n=40). Study group 3 received probiotic beverages (n=40). Group 4 was the control group, those who did not get probiotics (n=40). The samples were then plated onto culture media to test for Streptococcus mutans. S. mutans colonies were counted using a computerized colony counter.RESULTS: The mean values of colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans at baseline in the control group were 354±23.6, while they were 232±41.7 at the end of the observation duration. The difference was non-relevant statistically (p=0.793). The mean values of CFU/mL of S. mutans at baseline in the group taking probiotic lozenges were 358.7±39.93, while they were 57±10.12 at the end of the observation duration. The difference was relevant statistically (p=0.021). The mean values of CFU/mL of S. mutans at baseline in the group taking probiotic sachets were 321.36±41.67, while they were 215.5±22.66 at the end of the observation duration. The difference was relevant statistically (p=0.043). The mean values of CFU/mL of S. mutans at baseline in the group taking the probiotic drink were 335.76±40.12, while they were 75.1±28.74 at the end of the observation duration. The difference was relevant statistically (p=0.032).CONCLUSION: There was a significant decline in the number of colonies of S. mutans in all three forms of probiotics; however, the decline was greatest in the study participants taking probiotic lozenges.

The Effect Of Five Probiotic Lactobacilli Strains On The Growth And Biofilm Formation Of Streptococcus Mutans

Effect of Probiotic Lactobacilli on the Growth of Streptococcus Mutans and Multispecies Biofilms Isolated from Children with Active Caries

Chemical Characterization and Effect of a Lactobacilli-Postbiotic on Streptococcus mutans Biofilm In Vitro

Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. inhibit growth, biofilm formation and gene expression of caries-inducing Streptococcus mutans

Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of probiotic Lactobacillus curvatus BSF206 and Pediococcus pentosaceus AC1-2 against Streptococcus mutans

Co-aggregation and growth inhibition of probiotic lactobacilli and clinical isolates of mutans streptococci: an in vitro study

Effect of the Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus LB21 on the Cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans UA159 in a Dual-Species Biofilm Model

Inhibitory effect of probiotic Lactobacillus supernatants from the oral cavity on Streptococcus mutans biofilms

Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus salivarius on Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation

Isolation and Characterisation of Probiotics for Antagonising the Cariogenic Bacterium Streptococcus mutans and Preventing Biofilm Formation

Antimicrobial Effects of Postbiotic Mediators Derived from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus reuteri on Streptococcus mutans

Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans Clinical Isolates from Children with Early Childhood Caries

Lactobacillus plantarum Disrupts S. mutans–C. albicans Cross-Kingdom Biofilms

Safety Evaluation of Bifidobacterium Lactis BL-99 and Lacticaseibacillus Paracasei K56 and ET-22 in Vitro and in Vivo

Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Ln4 Showing Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect against Streptococcus mutans KCTC 5124 Causing Dental Caries

Effect of a Lactobacillus Salivarius Probiotic on a Double-Species Streptococcus Mutans and Candida Albicans Caries Biofilm

Probiotic Effects of Lactobacillus paracasei 28.4 to Inhibit Streptococcus mutans in a Gellan-Based Formulation

Effect of histatin-5 and lysozyme on the ability of Streptococcus mutans to form biofilms in in vitro conditions

Comparative Evaluation of Three Probiotics for Streptococcus mutans Prevention in Plaque Around Orthodontic Braces

Multi-Omics Reveals the Inhibition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCFM8724 in Streptococcus mutans-Candida albicans Mixed-Species Biofilms

Effect of a novel synbiotic on Streptococcus mutans