Value of Transrectal Ultrasonography for Tumor Node Metastasis Restaging in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

Hai-Hua Peng,Kai-Yun You,Cheng-Tao Wang,Rong Huang,Hong-Bo Shan,Jian-Hua Zhou,Xiao-Qing Pei,Yuan-Hong Gao,Bi-Xiu Wen,Meng-Zhong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/got028
2013-01-01
Gastroenterology Report
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To explore the value of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) for tumor node metastasis (TNM) restaging for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT).METHODS:One hundred and forty-nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 or cN+) who underwent TRUS after neo-CRT were retrospectively reviewed. TRUS restaging was compared with the results of post-operative pathological TNM findings.RESULTS:After neo-CRT, the accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing T-staging was 30.9%, with 60.4% (90/149) of cases overestimated. The sensitivity of TRUS for T-staging (T0 vs T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4) were 16.3%, 0%, 12.5%, 42.6% and 75.0%, respectively. The accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing N-staging after neo-CRT was 81.2%, with the sensitivities of N0 and N+ were 93.3% and 31.0%, respectively. After neo-CRT, 27.5% (41/149) of patients achieved pathologically complete response (pCR). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of TRUS for pCR were 17.1%, 99.1%, 87.5% and 75.9%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:TRUS can be applied for restaging T4 and N0, and has potential for screening out patients with pCR in those with locally advanced rectal cancer after neo-CRT, although some stages are overestimated for T-staging and its sensitivity for predicting pCR is low.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?