Abstract:Objective To compare the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).Methods From July 2009 to March 2013,114 patients were treated in our hospital due to renal carcinoma,including RAPN in 45 patients and LPN in 69 patients.Their data were retrospectively reviewed.Clinical and pathological variables,R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score,operation time (OT),warm ischemia time (WIT),estimated blood loss (EBL),drainage volume,the length of hospitalization,estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) outcomes,and complications were analyzed.Results There were no significant differences between the RAPN and LPN group with respect to patient age,sex,tumor laterality,size,R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score,the rate of hilar tumor and preoperative eGFR (P＞0.05).The median OT was shorter in the RAPN group than that in LPN group (165 min vs.196 min,P＜0.05).The median WIT was shorter in the RAPN than that in LPN group (21 min vs.25 min,P＜0.05).However,there were no significant differences in the postoperative eGFR and changing of eGFR within the 2 groups (P＞0.05).The rate of transfusion was similar between the RAPN (2/45) and LPN (4/69) group (P=0.72).There was also no significant difference in EBL (P=0.16).The drainage volume was also similar within two groups (167 ml vs.163 ml,P=0.81).The length of hospitalization was more favorable in the RAPN group (6.5 d vs.8.0 d,P=0.01).In RAPN group,27 cases were clear-cell carcinoma,5 cases were papillary cell carcinoma,2 cases were chromophobe cell carcinoma and 1 1 cases were angioleiomyolipoma.In LPN group,45 cases were clear-cell carcinoma,9 cases were papillary cell carcinoma,3 cases were chromophobe cell carcinoma and 12 cases were angioleiomyolipoma.There was no difference of pathological types between LPN and RAPN groups (P＞0.05).The rate of positive surgical margins was 0％ (0/45) in RAPN group and 1.4％ (1/69) in LPN group (P=0.69).The rates of complication requiring intervention (Clavien grade Ⅲ) were 2.2％ (1/45) and 2.9％ (2/69) in the RAPN and LPN group,respectively (P＞0.05).Median follow up was 12 (4-36) months in the RAPN and 13 (5-34) months in the LPN group.No local recurrence or metastasis occurred in two groups.Conclusions Early comparative outcomes suggest that RAPN has a significant benefit over the LPN in terms of OT,WIT and hospital stay.Meanwhile,it offers equivalent prognosis and postoperative renal function preservation compared with LPN.

A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison Of Perioperative And Early Renal Functional Outcomes Of Robotic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy

Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis

Robotic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Vs. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors with a RENAL Nephrometry Score ≥7: A Meta-Analysis

Robot‐assisted Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Anatomically Complex T1b Renal Tumors with a RENAL Nephrometry Score ≥7: A Propensity Score‐based Analysis

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis

Oncologic Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Treating Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Comparison of perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up

Propensity‐score Matched Analysis Comparing Robot‐assisted with Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Retroperitoneal robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Endophytic Renal Tumors: Comparison of Operative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes by Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors (RENAL Score ≥ 7): an Evidence-Based Analysis

Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Complex Renal Tumors: a Matched-Pair Comparison with a Long-Term Follow-Up

Comparison of perioperative outcomes for complex renal cell carcinoma between laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Comparison of the clinical outcome and perioperative complications between the laparoscopic and the open partial nephrectomy

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL or PADUA score ≥ 10): an evidence-based analysis

A Comparative Analysis of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with Selective Versus Main Artery Clamping in the Management of Early-Stage Kidney Cancer