Abstract:BACKGROUND:To determine the potential value of serum tumor markers in predicting pCR (pathological complete response) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively monitored the pro-, mid-, and post- neoadjuvant treatment serum tumor marker concentrations in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (stage II-III) who accepted pre-surgical chemotherapy or chemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between September 2011 and January 2014 and investigated the association of serum tumor marker levels with therapeutic effect. Core needle biopsy samples were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) prior to neoadjuvant treatment to determine hormone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2), and proliferation index Ki67 values. In our study, therapeutic response was evaluated by pCR, defined as the disappearance of all invasive cancer cells from excised tissue (including primary lesion and axillary lymph nodes) after completion of chemotherapy. Analysis of variance of repeated measures and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS:A total of 348 patients were recruited in our study after excluding patients with incomplete clinical information. Of these, 106 patients were observed to have acquired pCR status after treatment completion, accounting for approximately 30.5% of study individuals. In addition, 147patients were determined to be Her-2 positive, among whom the pCR rate was 45.6% (69 patients). General linear model analysis (repeated measures analysis of variance) showed that the concentration of cancer antigen (CA) 15-3 increased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in both pCR and non-pCR groups, and that there were significant differences between the two groups (P=0.008). The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of pre-, mid-, and post-treatment CA15-3 concentrations demonstrated low-level predictive value (AUC=0.594, 0.644, 0.621, respectively). No significant differences in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or CA12-5 serum levels were observed between the pCR and non-pCR groups (P=0.196 and 0.693, respectively). No efficient AUC of CEA or CA12-5 concentrations were observed to predict patient response toward neoadjuvant treatment (both less than 0.7), nor were differences between the two groups observed at different time points. We then analyzed the Her-2 positive subset of our cohort. Significant differences in CEA concentrations were identified between the pCR and non-pCR groups (P=0.039), but not in CA15-3 or CA12-5 levels (p=0.092 and 0.89, respectively). None of the ROC curves showed underlying prognostic value, as the AUCs of these three markers were less than 0.7. The ROC-AUCs for the CA12-5 concentrations of inter-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the estrogen receptor negative HER2 positive subgroup were 0.735 and 0.767, respectively. However, the specificity and sensitivity values were at odds with each other which meant that improving either the sensitivity or specificity would impair the efficiency of the other. CONCLUSIONS:Serum tumor markers CA15-3, CA12-5, and CEA might have little clinical significance in predicting neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer.

Preoperative CA 15-3 levels predict the prognosis of nonmetastatic luminal A breast cancer.

Elevated Levels of Serum Tumor Markers CEA and CA15-3 Are Prognostic Parameters for Different Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Serum levels of CEA and CA15-3 in different molecular subtypes and prognostic value in Chinese breast cancer.

P-STAT3 and IL-17 in Tumor Tissues Enhances the Prognostic Value of CEA and CA125 in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

Association of Preoperative Serum Levels of CEA and CA15-3 with Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer

Use of CEA and CA15-3 to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Serum levels of preoperative α-fetoprotein and CA19-9 predict survival of hepatic carcinoma patients after liver transplantation.

Serum CA125 is a predictive marker for breast cancer outcomes and correlates with molecular subtypes.

The prognostic significance of preoperative tumor marker (CEA, CA15-3) elevation in breast cancer patients: data from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry

Clinicopathological And Prognostic Significance Of Cancer Antigen 15-3 And Carcinoembryonic Antigen In Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Including 12,993 Patients

Combined Evaluation of Preoperative Serum CEA and CA125 As an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Adenocarcinoma

Determination of the Prognostic Value of Preoperative CA15-3 and CEA in Predicting the Prognosis of Young Patients with Breast Cancer.

Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen and CA15-3 Levels and the Risk of Site-Specific Metastases in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Identifying tumor markers-stratified subtypes (CA-125/CA19-9/carcinoembryonic antigen) in cervical adenocarcinoma

Clinical Value of Detecting Serum Tumor Markers in Postoperative Breast Cancer Patients

Combined neat model for the prognosis of postoperative stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Predictive and Prognostic Effect of CD133 and Cancer-Testis Antigens in Stage Ib-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Serum Tumor Marker Levels might have Little Significance in Evaluating Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum CEA and CA19-9 Values in Stage I ~ III Colorectal Cancer

Expression and significance of ER, PR, VEGF, CA15-3, CA125 and CEA in judging the prognosis of breast cancer.

Prospective Evaluation of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) and Carbohydrate Antigen 15.3 (CA 15.3) in Patients with Primary Locoregional Breast Cancer