Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging On Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography A New Technique For Differential Diagnosis Between Benign And Malignant Thyroid Nodules

Yi-Feng Zhang,Yong He,Hui-Xiong Xu,Xiao-Hong Xu,Chang Liu,Le-Hang Guo,Lin-Na Liu,Jun-Mei Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.4.585
2014-01-01
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Abstract:Objectives-Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography is a newly developed ultrasound elasticity imaging technique that included both Virtual Touch tissue quantification and Virtual Touch tissue imaging (VTI; Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain View, CA). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of VTI in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.Methods-This study included 192 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules (n = 219) who underwent surgery for compressive symptoms or suspicion of malignancy. Tissue stiffness on VTI elastography was scored from 1 (soft) to 6 (hard). The VTI scores between malignant and benign thyroid nodules were compared. The intraobserver and interobserver agreement for VTI elastography was also assessed.Results-On VTI elastography: score 1 was found in 84 nodules (all benign); score 2 in 37 nodules (3 papillary carcinomas and 34 benign nodules); score 3 in 25 nodules (1 medullary carcinoma, 6 papillary carcinomas, and 18 benign nodules); score 4 in 53 nodules (50 papillary carcinomas and 3 benign nodules); score Sin 17 nodules (14 papillary carcinomas and 3 benign nodules); and score 6 in 3 nodules (all papillary carcinomas). A VTI elasticity score of 4 or greater was highly predictive of malignancy (P < .01), and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.0% (67 of 77), 95.8% (136 of 142), 91.8% (67 of 73), 93.1% (136 of 146), and 92.7% (203 of 219), respectively. The kappa values were 0.69 for intraobserver agreement and 0.85 for interobserver agreement.Conclusions-Virtual Touch tissue elasticity imaging has great potential as an adjunctive tool combined with conventional sonography for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?