ALK, ROS1 and RET Fusions in 1139 Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Comprehensive Study of Common and Fusion Pattern-Specific Clinicopathologic, Histologic and Cytologic Features

Yunjian Pan,Yang Zhang,Yuan Li,Haichuan Hu,Lei Wang,Hang Li,Rui Wang,Ting Ye,Xiaoyang Luo,Yiliang Zhang,Bin Li,Deng Cai,Lei Shen,Yihua Sun,Haiquan Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.02.007
IF: 6.081
2014-01-01
Lung Cancer
Abstract:Background To have a comprehensive investigation of the clinicopathologic, histologic and cytologic features of fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas. Methods Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) were simultaneously performed to screen ALK, ROS1 and RET fusions in resected tumor samples from 1139 Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients, with validation of positive results using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Clinicopathologic characteristics, predominant histologic subtype and cytomorphology were assessed in fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas and compared to those harboring EGFR, KRAS, HER2 or BRAF mutations. Results There were 58 (5.1%) ALK fusions, 11 (1.0%) ROS1 fusions and 15 (1.3%) RET fusions. Tumors with ROS1 fusions had significantly larger diameter than ROS1 fusion-negative tumors (P = 0.007), whereas all the 15 tumors harboring RET fusions were ≤3 cm in diameter (P = 0.001). The three fusion genes were all more prevalent in solid-predominant adenocarcinoma. Compared to fusion-negative lung adenocarcinomas, tumors harboring a fusion gene had significantly higher prevalence of extracellular mucin (P < 0.001), cribriform pattern (P < 0.001), signet ring cells (P < 0.001) and hepatoid cytology (P < 0.001). No significant difference in relapse-free survival (P= 0.147) and overall survival (P= 0.444) was observed between fusion-positive and fusion-negative patients. Conclusions This study showed fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas had identifiable common and fusion-pattern specific clinicopathologic, histologic and cytologic features, offering implications for fusion genes screening.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?