The Putaminal Abnormalities on 3.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Can They Separate Parkinsonism-Predominant Multiple System Atrophy from Parkinson's Disease?

Jie-ying Feng,Biao Huang,Wan-Qun Yang,Yu-hu Zhang,Li-min Wang,Li-juan Wang,Xiao-ling Zhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114524090
2015-01-01
Acta Radiologica
Abstract:Background The putaminal abnormalities detected on 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as putaminal atrophy, slit-like hyperintense rim, and hypointensity in the putamen on T2-weighted (T2W) imaging are important signs on differentiating multiple system atrophy with parkinsonism (MSA-P) from Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the putaminal abnormalities may have different manifestations on 3.0 T from those on 1.5 T. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of putaminal abnormalities on 3.0 T MRI for differentiating MSA-P from PD. Material and Methods The study included a MSA-P group (9 men, 9 women), a PD group (12 men, 14 women), and a control group (11 men, 13 women). All subjects were examined with 3.0 T MRI using the conventional protocol. Putaminal atrophy, T2-hypointensity in the dorsolateral putamenat, and a slit-like hyperintense rim on the lateral putamen were evaluated in each subject. Results There were no significant differences in the slit-like hyperintense rim ( P = 0.782) or T2-hypointensity in the dorsolateral putamen ( P = 0.338) among the three groups. Bilateral putaminal atrophy was found in 44.4% (8 of 18) of the MSA-P patients, in only 7.7% (2 of 26) of the PD patients, and in none of the controls. The proportion of subjects with putaminal atrophy was significantly higher in the MAS-P group ( P = 0.008) and control group ( P < 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of putaminal atrophy for distinguishing MSA-P from PD was 92.3% and 44.4%, respectively. Conclusion The signal changes in the putamen on T2W imaging on 3.0 T MRI, including slit-like hyperintense rim and putaminal hypointensity, are not specific signs for MSA-P. Putaminal atrophy is highly specific for differentiating MSA-P from PD and healthy controls, but its insufficient sensitivity limits its diagnostic value.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?