Abstract:An in‐depth understanding of wild animal behaviour and movement has assumed prime importance in recent years in light of an urgent need to augment our forecasting, conservation and management capacities in the face of rapid environmental change. Since gathering data on wild animals in their natural habitats is often precluded by logistical difficulty, animal‐borne sensor systems that offer the possibility of continuously and remotely recording data as the animal goes about its daily life have been developed (Ropert‐Coudert & Wilson, 2005 ). Over the two decades since their first application to remote monitoring of animal behaviour (e.g. Sellers, Varley, & Waters, 1998 ), animal‐borne accelerometers have been employed to gain insights into the life histories of species as far apart in size, type of habitat, speed and mode of locomotion as chipmunks ( Tamias alpinus ) (Hammond, Springthorpe, Walsh, & Berg‐Kirkpatrick, 2016 ), seals ( Leptonychotes weddellii ) (Naito, Bornemann, Takahashi, McIntyre, & Plötz, 2010 ), African wild dogs ( Lycaon pictus ) and cheetahs ( Acinonyx jubatus ) (Cozzi et al., 2012 ), vultures ( Gyps fulvus ) (Nathan et al., 2012 ) and blue whales ( Balaenoptera musculus ) (Goldbogen et al., 2011 ). To keep pace with the increasing ubiquity of accelerometry, developing methods applicable across species has become essential. For instance, general methods have been developed to infer animal energy expenditure from recorded acceleration (Wilson et al., 2006 ). However, despite progress in recognising animal behaviour from recorded acceleration, there is as yet no single technique that combines under one framework the virtues of easy‐to‐implement machine learning on the one hand, and the interpretability and robustness of biomechanically defined classification rules on the other. Machine learning, often rather unenviably referred to as a black box (e.g. McClune et al., 2014 ), has been widely employed to infer animal behaviour from raw acceleration data (Nathan et al., 2012 ; Grünewälder et al., 2012 ; Gao, Campbell, Bidder, & Hunter, 2013 ; Bidder et al., 2014 ; Resheff, Rotics, Harel, Spiegel, & Nathan, 2014 ; Wang et al., 2015 ). Despite the power and ease of use of machine learning approaches, the need to develop behaviour recognition tools generalisable across species has brought to light the importance of being able to physically interpret classification rules, even at the cost of small gains in classification accuracy (Nathan et al., 2012 ). Model interpretability becomes particularly significant when accurately recognising relatively rarer behaviours is important. When machine learning approaches are applied to datasets that are heavily skewed in the frequency and duration of different behaviours (Watanabe, Izawa, Kato, Ropert‐Coudert, & Naito, 2005 ; Grünewälder et al., 2012 ; Resheff et al., 2014 ; Wang et al., 2015 ), large overall accuracies may be obtained even when the recognition accuracy of under‐represented behaviours is poor (He & Garcia, 2009 ); the issue of imbalanced classes has even been called a 'curse' in machine learning literature (Lemaitre, Nogueira, & Aridas, 2017 ). This occurs because machine learning algorithms typically seek to minimise the overall misclassification rate, and thus tend to optimise for the most frequent behaviours since they contribute most to the overall accuracy—the classification performance of rare behaviours may nevertheless remain poor. Examination of the classification rules would help understand how to improve the recognition of rarer behaviours. However, the use of many features, which is typical with machine learning approaches (>15: Nathan et al., 2012 ; Resheff et al., 2014 ; Wang et al., <a href="#mee313172-bib-0028" -Abstract Truncated-

Love Thy Neighbour: Automatic Animal Behavioural Classification of Acceleration Data Using the K-nearest Neighbour Algorithm.

A novel biomechanical approach for animal behaviour recognition using accelerometers

High accuracy at low frequency: detailed behavioural classification from accelerometer data

Exploring deep learning techniques for wild animal behaviour classification using animal‐borne accelerometers

Creating a Behavioural Classification Module for Acceleration Data: Using a Captive Surrogate for Difficult to Observe Species

The Use of Triaxial Accelerometers and Machine Learning Algorithms for Behavioural Identification in Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris): A Validation Study

Classification of broiler behaviours using triaxial accelerometer and machine learning

The use of an unsupervised learning approach for characterizing latent behaviors in accelerometer data

Seek and learn: Automated identification of microevents in animal behaviour using envelopes of acceleration data and machine learning

The Use of Triaxial Accelerometers and Machine Learning Algorithms for Behavioural Identification in Domestic Cats (Felis catus): A Validation Study

Animal Behavior Classification via Accelerometry Data and Recurrent Neural Networks

Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior

Goats on the Move: Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Goat Activity Analysis Using Accelerometer Data

Application of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) Algorithm for Human Action Recognition

Introduction to Machine Learning: K-Nearest Neighbors

Dog behaviour classification with movement sensors placed on the harness and the collar

Classifying behavior from short-interval biologging data: An example with GPS tracking of birds

Machine Learning Methods and Visual Observations to Categorize Behavior of Grazing Cattle Using Accelerometer Signals

109 Animal Behavior Analysis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning Techniques

Remote monitoring of vigilance behavior in large herbivores using acceleration data

Predicting moose behaviors from tri-axial accelerometer data using a supervised classification algorithm