Complete Atrioventricular Septal Defect: Comparison of Modified Single-Patch Technique with Two-Patch Technique in Infants

Gaofeng Pan,Laichun Song,Xuefeng Zhou,Jinping Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12295
IF: 1.778
2014-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
Abstract:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the modified single-patch technique with the two-patch technique for infants with complete atrioventricular septal defects (AVSDs).MethodsBetween December 2001 and October 2011, 98 infants underwent complete AVSD primary repair. Forty-six patients had a modified single-patch technique; 59 patients had a two-patch technique. Eighty-seven patients had follow-up by echocardiography to measure the degree of valve regurgitation.ResultsThere were two deaths (one in modified single-patch group and one in two-patch group). Cross-clamp times and cardiopulmonary bypass times were shorter in the modified single-patch group (70.5621.05 vs. 83.76 +/- 22.74minutes, p=0.004; 95.02 +/- 19.73 vs. 109.9 +/- 34.07, p=0.011). There was no patient with third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block in the modified single-patch group, while two patients in the two-patch group required a pacemaker (3.85%, p=NS). During follow-up, one death occurred in the single-patch group and three deaths in the two-patch group. At last follow-up, ten patients had more than moderate left AV valve regurgitation (four in single-patch group vs. six in two-patch group, p=0.886) and eight patients required reoperation (three in single-patch group vs. five in two-patch group, p=0.841). One patient in the single-patch group required reoperation for a residual ventricular septal defect and none in the two-patch group.ConclusionsModified single-patch repair in infants with complete AVSD is a safe and reproducible technique. The results are as good as the two-patch technique. Among long-term survivors, most have very good clinical and functional results and minimal or no regurgitation of either AV valve. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12295 (J Card Surg 2014;29:251-255)
What problem does this paper attempt to address?