How diagnostic concepts of schizophrenia differ.

THOMAS E. GIFT,JOHN S. STRAUSS,BARRY A. RITZLER,RONALD F. KOKES,DAVID W. HARDER
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198001000-00002
1980-01-01
Abstract:How do various diagnostic definitions of schizophrenia compare? As part of a larger study of diagnosis and prognosis, nine different systems used for diagnosing schizophrenia were applied to a sample of patients (N=272) from two geographical catchment areas who had been hospitalized for the first time in their lives for functional psychiatric illness. The size and composition of the groups diagnosed schizophrenic by each set of criteria were then compared with respect to five clinical variables hypothesized to be important for differentiating the diagnostic systems. All data were collected with structured interviews of demonstrated reliability. Results showed that several of the variables tested distinguished schizophrenics diagnosed by some systems from those considered schizophrenic by other systems and from those patients in the sample not considered schizophrenic by any system. High levels of delusions of passivity characterized the patients classified as schizophrenic by three systems: Schneider, Langfeldt, and the Flexible System. High psychosis scores characterized the patients considered schizophrenic by the New Haven Schizophrenia Index. Increased chronicity and low levels of affective symptoms characterized the patients considered schizophrenic by the Feighner criteria. Poor work and social function characterized the patients considered schizophrenic by the hospital physician using DSM-II guidelines. These and other findings reported indicate that the various systems for diagnosing schizophrenia have both characteristic differences and overlap. Considering these can help to delineate the extent to which research findings or clinical experience based on the system can be generalized to findings based upon another.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?