Observation of a charged (DD*)± mass peak in e+ e- → πDD* at sqrt[s] = 4.26  GeV.

Ablikim M,Achasov M N,Albayrak O,Ambrose D J,An F F,An Q,Bai J Z,Baldini Ferroli R,Ban Y,Becker J,Bennett J V,Bertani M,Bian J M,Boger E,Bondarenko O,Boyko I,Braun S,Briere R A,Bytev V,Cai H,Cai X,Cakir O,Calcaterra A,Cao G F,Cetin S A,Chang J F,Chelkov G,Chen G,Chen H S,Chen J C,Chen M L,Chen S J,Chen X R,Chen Y B,Cheng H P,Chu X K,Chu Y P,Cronin-Hennessy D,Dai H L,Dai J P,Dedovich D,Deng Z Y,Denig A,Denysenko I,Destefanis M,Ding W M,Ding Y,Dong L Y,Dong M Y,Du S X,Fang J,Fang S S,Fava L,Feng C Q,Friedel P,Fu C D,Fu J L,Fuks O,Gao Y,Geng C,Goetzen K,Gong W X,Gradl W,Greco M,Gu M H,Gu Y T,Guan Y H,Guo A Q,Guo L B,Guo T,Guo Y P,Han Y L,Harris F A,He K L,He M,He Z Y,Held T,Heng Y K,Hou Z L,Hu C,Hu H M,Hu J F,Hu T,Huang G M,Huang G S,Huang J S,Huang L,Huang X T,Huang Y,Hussain T,Ji C S,Ji Q,Ji Q P,Ji X B,Ji X L,Jiang L L,Jiang X S,Jiao J B,Jiao Z,Jin D P,Jin S,Jing F F,Kalantar-Nayestanaki N,Kavatsyuk M,Kloss B,Kopf B,Kornicer M,Kuehn W,Lai W,Lange J S,Lara M,Larin P,Leyhe M,Li C H,Li Cheng,Li Cui,Li D L,Li D M,Li F,Li G,Li H B,Li J C,Li K,Li Lei,Li N,Li P R,Li Q J,Li W D,Li W G,Li X L,Li X N,Li X Q,Li X R,Li Z B,Liang H,Liang Y F,Liang Y T,Liao G R,Lin D X,Liu B J,Liu C L,Liu C X,Liu F H,Liu Fang,Liu Feng,Liu H B,Liu H H,Liu H M,Liu J P,Liu K,Liu K Y,Liu P L,Liu Q,Liu S B,Liu X,Liu Y B,Liu Z A,Liu Zhiqiang,Liu Zhiqing,Loehner H,Lou X C,Lu G R,Lu H J,Lu J G,Lu X R,Lu Y P,Luo C L,Luo M X,Luo T,Luo X L,Lv M,Ma F C,Ma H L,Ma Q M,Ma S,Ma T,Ma X Y,Maas F E,Maggiora M,Malik Q A,Mao Y J,Mao Z P,Messchendorp J G,Min J,Min T J,Mitchell R E,Mo X H,Moeini H,MoralesMorales C,Moriya K,Muchnoi N Yu,Muramatsu H,Nefedov Y,Nikolaev I B,Ning Z,Nisar S,Olsen S L,Ouyang Q,Pacetti S,Park J W,Pelizaeus M,Peng H P,Peters K,Ping J L,Ping R G,Poling R,Prencipe E,Qi M,Qian S,Qiao C F,Qin L Q,Qin X S,Qin Y,Qin Z H,Qiu J F,Rashid K H,Redmer C F,Ripka M,Rong G,Ruan X D,Sarantsev A,Schumann S,Shan W,Shao M,Shen C P,Shen X Y,Sheng H Y,Shepherd M R,Song W M,Song X Y,Spataro S,Spruck B,Sun G X,Sun J F,Sun S S,Sun Y J,Sun Y Z,Sun Z J,Sun Z T,Tang C J,Tang X,Tapan I,Thorndike E H,Toth D,Ullrich M,Uman I,Varner G S,Wang B,Wang D,Wang D Y,Wang K,Wang L L,Wang L S,Wang M,Wang P,Wang P L,Wang Q J,Wang S G,Wang X F,Wang X L,Wang Y D,Wang Y F,Wang Y Q,Wang Z,Wang Z G,Wang Z H,Wang Z Y,Wei D H,Wei J B,Weidenkaff P,Wen Q G,Wen S P,Werner M,Wiedner U,Wu L H,Wu N,Wu S X,Wu W,Wu Z,Xia L G,Xia Y X,Xiao Z J,Xie Y G,Xiu Q L,Xu G F,Xu Q J,Xu Q N,Xu X P,Xue Z,Yan L,Yan W B,Yan W C,Yan Y H,Yang H X,Yang Y,Yang Y X,Yang Y Z,Ye H,Ye M,Ye M H,Yu B X,Yu C X,Yu H W,Yu J S,Yu S P,Yuan C Z,Yuan W L,Yuan Y,Zafar A A,Zallo A,Zang S L,Zeng Y,Zhang B X,Zhang B Y,Zhang C,Zhang C B,Zhang C C,Zhang D H,Zhang H H,Zhang H Y,Zhang J L,Zhang J Q,Zhang J W,Zhang J Y,Zhang J Z,Zhang LiLi,Zhang S H,Zhang X J,Zhang X Y,Zhang Y,Zhang Y H,Zhang Z P,Zhang Z Y,Zhang Zhenghao,Zhao G,Zhao J W,Zhao Lei,Zhao Ling,Zhao M G,Zhao Q,Zhao S J,Zhao T C,Zhao X H,Zhao Y B,Zhao Z G,Zhemchugov A,Zheng B,Zheng J P,Zheng Y H,Zhong B,Zhou L,Zhou X,Zhou X K,Zhou X R,Zhu K,Zhu K J,Zhu X L,Zhu Y C,Zhu Y S,Zhu Z A,Zhuang J,Zou B S,Zou J H,null null

IF: 8.6

2014-01-01

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:We report on a study of the process e+ e- → π± (DD*)∓ at sqrt[s] = 4.26  GeV using a 525 pb(-1) data sample collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII storage ring. A distinct charged structure is observed in the (DD*)∓ invariant mass distribution. When fitted to a mass-dependent-width Breit-Wigner line shape, the pole mass and width are determined to be Mpole = (3883.9±1.5(stat)±4.2(syst))  MeV/c2 and Γpole = (24.8±3.3(stat)±11.0(syst))  MeV. The mass and width of the structure, which we refer to as Zc(3885), are 2σ and 1σ, respectively, below those of the Zc(3900) → π± J/ψ peak observed by BESIII and Belle in π+ π- J/ψ final states produced at the same center-of-mass energy. The angular distribution of the πZc(3885) system favors a JP = 1+ quantum number assignment for the structure and disfavors 1- or 0-. The Born cross section times the DD* branching fraction of the Zc(3885) is measured to be σ(e+ e- → π± Zc(3885)∓)×B(Zc(3885)∓ → (DD*)∓) = (83.5±6.6(stat)±22.0(syst))   pb. Assuming the Zc(3885) → DD* signal reported here and the Zc(3900) → πJ/ψ signal are from the same source, the partial width ratio (Γ(Zc(3885) → DD*)/Γ(Zc(3900) → πJ/ψ)) = 6.2±1.1(stat)±2.7(syst) is determined.