Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) are gain and loss of DNA sequence of a genome. High throughput platforms such as microarrays and next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) have been applied for genome wide copy number losses. Although progress has been made in both approaches, the accuracy and consistency of CNV calling from the two platforms remain in dispute. In this study, we perform a deep analysis on copy number losses on 254 human DNA samples, which have both SNP microarray data and NGS data publicly available from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project respectively. We show that the copy number losses reported from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genome Project only have < 30% overlap, while these reports are required to have cross-platform (e.g. PCR, microarray and high-throughput sequencing) experimental supporting by their corresponding projects, even though state-of-art calling methods were employed. On the other hand, copy number losses are found directly from HapMap microarray data by an accurate algorithm, i.e. CNVhac, almost all of which have lower read mapping depth in NGS data; furthermore, 88% of which can be supported by the sequences with breakpoint in NGS data. Our results suggest the ability of microarray calling CNVs and the possible introduction of false negatives from the unessential requirement of the additional cross-platform supporting. The inconsistency of CNV reports from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project might result from the inadequate information containing in microarray data, the inconsistent detection criteria, or the filtration effect of cross-platform supporting. The statistical test on CNVs called from CNVhac show that the microarray data can offer reliable CNV reports, and majority of CNV candidates can be confirmed by raw sequences. Therefore, the CNV candidates given by a good caller could be highly reliable without cross-platform supporting, so additional experimental information should be applied in need instead of necessarily.

Pscc: Sensitive And Reliable Population-Scale Copy Number Variation Detection Method Based On Low Coverage Sequencing

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

A Single Cell Level Based Method For Copy Number Variation Analysis By Low Coverage Massively Parallel Sequencing

High Detection Rate of Copy Number Variations Using Capture Sequencing Data: A Retrospective Study

SeqCNV: a Novel Method for Identification of Copy Number Variations in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data

Copy number variation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes.

Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation

PEcnv: accurate and efficient detection of copy number variations of various lengths

CNV-P: a machine-learning framework for predicting high confident copy number variations

SCCNV: A Software Tool for Identifying Copy Number Variation From Single-Cell Whole-Genome Sequencing

CRSCNV: A Cross-Model-Based Statistical Approach to Detect Copy Number Variations in Sequence Data

Copy Number Analysis Of Whole-Genome Data Using Bic-Seq2 And Its Application To Detection Of Cancer Susceptibility Variants

Copy‐Number Variants Detection by Low‐Pass Whole‐Genome Sequencing

Copy Number Aberrations from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 Genotyping Data-How Accurate Are Commonly Used Prediction Approaches?

An Accurate and Powerful Method for Copy Number Variation Detection

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods

Low-pass Whole-Genome Sequencing in Clinical Cytogenetics: a Validated Approach.

DL-CNV: A Deep Learning Method for Identifying Copy Number Variations Based on Next Generation Target Sequencing

msCNVS: medium throughput single cell copy number variation sequencing with barcoded library construction free of preamplification toward clinical implementation

Low-Pass Genome Sequencing: Validation and Diagnostic Utility from 409 Clinical Cases of Low-Pass Genome Sequencing for the Detection of Copy Number Variants to Replace Constitutional Microarray