Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan Versus 5-Fu/leucovorin Plus Irinotecan in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.

Yuanbiao Guo,Min Shi,Xiaoheng Shen,Chen Yang,Liu Yang,Jun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2013.12.004
IF: 4.035
2013-01-01
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The XELIRI regimen and FOLFIRI regimen are used as the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. A comparison of findings from different studies that examined the efficacy and safety of these 2 regimens often show conflicting results. This metaanalysis compared the XELIRI and FOLFIRI regimens in the treatment of mCRC.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Six studies comparing the safety and efficacy of XELIRI- and FOLFIRI-based treatment of mCRC were identified from MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (until January 31, 2013) databases.RESULTS:No significant difference in ORR, PFS, or OS between XELIRI and FOLFIRI as first-line therapy in patients with colorectal cancer was found in this analysis. Except for XELIRI being associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea, both treatment regimens had similar safety profiles.CONCLUSION:Both XELIRI and FOLFIRI regimens had similar efficacy as first-line treatment in patients with mCRC with similar adverse event profiles. Our findings suggest that XELIRI and FOLFIRI are appropriate first-line treatment options for mCRC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?