Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the physical and chemical properties, immunogenicity, and osteogenesis of two antigen-extracted xenogeneic bone scaffolds-decalcified bone matrix (DBM) and calcined bone. Methods: By removing the inorganic and organic components of adult pig femus, xenogeneic DBM and calcined bone were prepared respectively. The density and pH value of the two materials were measured and calculated, the material morphology and pore diameter were observed by scanning electron microscope, and the surface contact angle was measured by automatic contact angle measuring instrument. The safety, osteogenic activity, and immunogenicity of the two materials were evaluated by cytotoxicity test, osteoblast proliferation test, DNA residue test, and human peripheral blood lymphocyte proliferation test. The two materials were implanted into the 5 mm full-thickness skull defect of 6-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats (the blank control group was not implanted with materials). The materials were taken at 4 and 8 weeks after operation, the repair effect of the materials on the rat skull was observed and evaluated by gross observation, Micro-CT scanning, and HE staining observation. Results: Compared with calcined bone, DBM has lower density and poor hydrophilicity; the pH value of the two materials was 5.5-6.1, and the pore diameter was 160-800 μm. The two materials were non-cytotoxic and could promote the proliferation of osteoblasts. The absorbance ( A) values of osteoblast proliferation at 1, 4, and 7 days in the DBM group were significantly higher than those in the calcined bone group ( P<0.05). The DNA residues of the two materials were much lower than 50 ng/mg dry weight, and neither of them could stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. The results of animal experiments in vivo showed that the bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) in DBM group and calcined bone group were significantly higher than that in blank control group at 4 weeks after operation ( P<0.05), and that in calcined bone group was significantly higher than that in DBM group ( P<0.05); at 8 weeks after operation, there was no significant difference in BV/TV between groups ( P>0.05). HE staining showed that at 4 and 8 weeks after operation, the defect in the blank control group was filled with fibrous connective tissue, the defect was obvious, and no bone growth was found; the defect in DBM group and calcined bone group had been repaired to varying degrees, and a large number of new bone formation could be seen. The material degradability of DBM group was better than that of calcined bone group. Conclusion: The physical and chemical properties and degradability of the two kinds of xenogeneic bone scaffolds were slightly different, both of them have no immunogenicity and can promote the repair and reconstruction of skull defects in rats.

Variability in Particle Degradation of Four Commonly Employed Dental Bone Grafts.

Histomorphometric Study of New Bone Formation Comparing Defect Healing with Three Bone Grafting Materials: the Effect of Osteoporosis on Graft Consolidation.

Physiochemical Characterization and Biological Effect of Anorganic Bovine Bone Matrix and Organic-Containing Bovine Bone Matrix in Comparison with Bio-Oss in Rabbits

Radiographic Assessment of Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) and Collagen-Stabilized DBBM for Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: A 2-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Evaluation of Demineralized Bone Matrix Particles Delivered by Alginate Hydrogel for a Bone Graft Substitute: an Animal Experimental Study

Experimental studies on biocompatibility of heterogeneous demineralized bone matrix particles]

Effect of Resorption Rate and Osteoconductivity of Biodegradable Calcium Phosphate Materials on the Acquisition of Natural Bone Strength in the Repaired Bone

[Performance evaluation of two antigen-extracted xenogeneic ostein and experimental study on repairing skull defects in rats]

Degradation of bone repairing composite of calcium polyphosphate fiber, calcium phospate cement and micromorselized bone in vitro

Comparing the Rate of Dissolution of Two Commercially Available Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes

A Comparison of Osteocyte Bioactivity in Fine Particulate Bone Powder Grafts Vs Larger Bone Grafts in A Rat Bone Repair Model

In vivo degradation of beta-tricalcium phosphate/poly-L-lactide composites in cancellous bone

[Histological Observation of Bio-Derived Bone Prepared by Different Methods after Implantation].

Reliability Of Acellular Decalcified And Decalcified Teeth As Bone Graft Material: An Experimental And Pathological Study In Rats

In Vitro and in Vivo Degradation of Mineralized Collagen-Based Composite Scaffold: Nanohydroxyapatite/collagen/poly(l-Lactide).

Comparison of demineralized bone matrix with different cycling crushing times in posterolateral fusion model of athymic rats

Bone grafting material in combination with Osteogain for bone repair: a rat histomorphometric study

Preparation and Degradation Characteristic Study of Bone Repair Composite of DL-polylactic Acid/hydroxyapatite/decalcifying Bone Matrix

Evaluation of Biocomposite Cements for Bone Defect Repair in Rat Models

Periodontal bone regeneration with a degradable thermoplastic HA/PLCL bone graft.

Adsorption of enamel matrix proteins to a bovine-derived bone grafting material and its regulation of cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation.