Abstract:Background Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure addressing the protrusion of abdominal viscera through the inguinal canal. Despite advancements, complications such as chronic postoperative pain, infections, and hernia recurrence persist. Traditional sutured polypropylene mesh can cause nerve irritation and inflammation, leading to chronic pain and other issues. Innovations in hernia repair, like the self-gripping, low-density, macroporous polyester mesh, aim to mitigate these problems. This mesh adheres to tissues without sutures, potentially reducing operative time, postoperative pain, and related complications. The study compares the clinical outcomes of sutureless self-gripping polyester mesh versus sutured polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair, focusing on operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay length, seroma formation, and hernia recurrence to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the self-gripping mesh. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted over one year at our hospital. Sixty patients with uncomplicated primary inguinal hernias were enrolled and divided into two groups: group A (self-gripping polyester mesh) and group B (sutured polypropylene mesh). The primary outcomes measured included operative time, postoperative pain (visual analog scale), hospital stay length, seroma formation, and hernia recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with descriptive and inferential statistics applied to compare the outcomes between the groups. Results The study found no significant differences in demographic variables between the two groups. The self-gripping polyester mesh (SF) group had significantly shorter operative times (67.2 minutes vs. 88.1 minutes, p < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (3.30 vs. 4.60, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (3.2 days vs. 5.2 days, p = 0.000) compared to the sutured polypropylene mesh (SM) group. Rates of seroma formation and hernia recurrence were not significantly different between the groups. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the type of mesh was a significant predictor of postoperative pain scores, with self-gripping mesh associated with lower pain. Conclusions Self-gripping polyester mesh offers significant advantages over traditional sutured polypropylene mesh in inguinal hernia repair, including reduced operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital stay without increasing the risk of seroma formation or hernia recurrence. These findings suggest that self-gripping mesh may be a superior option for inguinal hernia repair, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. Further multicenter studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to confirm these benefits.

The Comparison of Self-Gripping Mesh and Sutured Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: the Results of Meta-Analysis.

Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature.

A Meta-Analysis Examining the Use of Fibrin Glue Mesh Fixation Versus Suture Mesh Fixation in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Sutured Versus Sutureless Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh in Patients With Uncomplicated Indirect Inguinal Hernia in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Meta-analysis of Mesh-Plug Repair and Lichtenstein Repair in the Treatment of Primary Inguinal Hernia

The Comparison of Lightweight Mesh and Standard Mesh in Incisional Hernia Repair with the Open Sublay Technique: the Results of a Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between tissue glue and suture for mesh fixation in open tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a prospective analytical study

Comparison of Mesh-Plug and Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Clinical control trial comparing self-gripping mesh with biologic prosthetic material in postoperative pain after open inguinal herniorrhaphy

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Staple Fixation Against Adhesive Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and safety of glue mesh fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Staple Fixation Against Adhesive Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Application of self-fixating mesh in local anesthesia for repairing of Inguinal hernia

Glue versus mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Long-Term Follow-Up of Lichtenstein Repair of Inguinal Hernia in the Morbid Patients with Self-Gripping Mesh (Progriptm)

Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparison of open preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia