Abstract:BACKGROUND: The results of studies comparing Billroth-I (B-I) with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) reconstruction on the quality of life (QoL) are still inconsistent. The aim of this trial was to compare the long-term QoL of B-I with R-Y anastomosis after curative distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.METHODS: A total of 140 patients undergoing curative distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in West China Hospital, Sichuan University from May 2011 to May 2014 were randomly assigned to the B-I group ( N = 70) and R-Y group ( N = 70). The follow-up time points were 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the operation. The final follow-up time was May 2019. The clinicopathological features, operative safety, postoperative recovery, long-term survival as well as QoL were compared, among which QoL score was the primary outcome. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied.RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, and postoperative recovery between the two groups. Less estimated blood loss and shorter surgical duration were found in the B-I group. There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79% [55/70] of the B-I group vs. 80% [56/70] of the R-Y group, P = 0.966) and recurrence-free survival rates (79% [55/70] of the B-I group vs. 78% [55/70] of the R-Y group, P = 0.979) between the two groups. The scores of the global health status of the R-Y group were higher than those of the B-I group with statistically significant differences (postoperative 1 year: 85.4 ± 13.1 vs . 88.8 ± 16.1, P = 0.033; postoperative 3 year: 87.3 ± 15.2 vs . 92.8 ± 11.3, P = 0.028; postoperative 5 year: 90.9 ± 13.7 vs . 96.4 ± 5.6, P = 0.010), and the reflux (postoperative 3 year: 8.8 ± 12.9 vs . 2.8 ± 5.3, P = 0.001; postoperative 5 year: 5.1 ± 9.8 vs . 1.8 ± 4.7, P = 0.033) and epigastric pain (postoperative 1 year: 11.8 ± 12.7 vs. 6.1 ± 8.8, P = 0.008; postoperative 3 year: 9.4 ± 10.6 vs. 4.6 ± 7.9, P = 0.006; postoperative 5 year: 6.0 ± 8.9 vs . 2.7 ± 4.6, P = 0.022) were milder in the R-Y group than those of the B-I group at the postoperative 1, 3, and 5-year time points.CONCLUSIONS: Compared with B-I group, R-Y reconstruction was associated with better long-term QoL by reducing reflux and epigastric pain, without changing survival outcomes.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-TRC-10001434.

Interim Report of Prospective Clinical Study of Two Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction after Total Gastrectomy

Comparison of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer with Stage Ct1-2.

Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Comparative Study with Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy at a High-Volume Center

Evaluation Of Early Surgical Outcomes, Acute Inflammatory Response And Oncological Outcomes In Patients Undergo Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy: A Prospective Comparision With Open Distal Gastrectomy

[Comparison Study of Three Methods of Digestive Tract Reconstruction after Radical Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients].

[Two types of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled study]

Comparison of long-term quality of life between Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Comparative Efficacy Analysis after Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Digestive Tract Reconstruction Formula

Effects of Different Gastrointestinal Reconstruction Techniques on Nutrition, Anemia, and Quality of Life in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Comparative analysis of two digestive tract reconstruction methods in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy

A 3-Arm case-matched analysis of anti-reflux reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy - Single tract jejunal interposition vs double tract reconstruction vs tube-like stomach reconstruction

Quality of Life after Totally Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Totally Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy: Retrospective Cohort Study

Double-tract Reconstruction is Superior to Esophagogastrostomy in Controlling Reflux Esophagitis and Enhancing Quality of Life after Proximal Gastrectomy: Results from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial in China.

[Comparison of Different Alimentary Reconstructions after Total Gastrectomy for Cancer].

The Clinical Comparison of Totally Laparoscopic Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms in gastric cancer after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

Double Tract Reconstruction Reduces Reflux Esophagitis and Improves Quality of Life after Radical Proximal Gastrectomy for Patients with Upper Gastric or Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma

Curative Effect of Digestive Tract Reconstruction after Radical Gastrectomy for Distal Gastric Cancer

[The Application of Uncut Roux-en-Y Esophagojejunostomy with Distal Jejunal Pouch on Behalf of the Stomach Surgery in the Digestive Tract Reconstruction after Total Gastrectomy].

Comparing the Short-Term Outcomes of Intracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy with Extracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer