EF-G and EF4: Translocation and Back-Translocation on the Bacterial Ribosome.

Hiroshi Yamamoto,Yan Qin,John Achenbach,Chengmin Li,Jaroslaw Kijek,Christian M. T. Spahn,Knud H. Nierhaus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3176
IF: 88.1
2014-01-01
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Abstract:Key Points Ribosomal translocation and back-translocation refer to the forward and backward movements of the tRNA 2 –mRNA complex on the ribosome during elongation. Elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyses translocation and EF4 catalyses the reverse reaction. EF-G and EF4 have very similar structures and differ by each having only one factor-specific domain; domain IV of EF-G and the carboxy-terminal domain of EF4. The domains that are common to both factors are responsible for binding to the ribosome and GTPase activity, the specific domains are responsible for mediating translocation and back-translocation. Evidence so far suggests that EF4 mobilizes stalled ribosomes either before or after translocation, thus accelerating protein synthesis. Translocation and back-translocation are controlled by a constriction of the the neck of the small subunit to approximately 14 Å, which is termed the A790 gate. This gap is too narrow for movement of the anticodon stem of the tRNA as it has a diameter of 20 Å. The A790 gate is closed in all functional states except during an intermediate translocation state, in which the gate is open to a width of more than 23 Å. EF-G, and probably also EF4, cause a rotation of the 30S head relative to the 30S body (termed swivelling), which opens the A790 gate and enables the subsequent translocation and back-translocation of the tRNA 2 –mRNA complex. Domain IV of EF-G flips into the A-site as soon this site becomes free during translocation. This 'doorstop' function of domain IV prevents tRNA back-translocation, as long as the A790 gate is open. On the mRNA side, this function is supported by the 16S rRNA bases C1397 and A1505 that intercalate with bases of the mRNA, thereby blocking its movement. The available structures suggest that the orientation of His92 of EF-G ( Escherichia coli nomenclature) is a diagnostic feature of the activity state of the GTPase centre. An active state is observed exclusively in the translocation intermediate state, in which His92 is located 3 Å away from the bound GTP and points towards the γ-phosphate of GTP; whereas in the inactive state (after translocation), His92 has moved further away (at a distance of 9 Å) and turns away from the γ-phosphate of GTP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?