Biostructural augmentation for the osteonecrotic femoral head by implanting a composite of allogeneic bone support frame, autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix
Rong-cheng Mei,Shu-hua Yang,Cao Yang,Bao-xing Li,Jin Li,Zhe-wei Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2008.19.003
2008-01-01
Abstract:Background: Currently, the effect of bone grafting with biostructural augmentation on femoral collapse is not satisfactory. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head by biostructural augmentation through insertion of allogeneic bone support frame in combination with autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix following core decompression procedure. Design, Time and Setting: The randomized controlled animal trial was performed at Orthopaedics Laboratory, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from October 2005 to July 2006; the clinical case analyses were performed at Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital from January 2001 to April 2005. Materials: Goat and human allogeneic bone support frame was developed by China Institute for Radiation Protection Tissue Bank; 20 adult male fat-tailed sheep were selected for models of osteonecrosis of the bilateral femoral heads. Participants: Twenty-three patients (24 hips) with early or middle stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head were enrolled, and those at Ficat IV stage and III stage and affected articular surface scope> 15% were excluded. Methods: Eighteen sheep were randomly divided into 3 groups. Core decompression alone group only underwent core decompression procedure for the osteonecrotic femoral heads; autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix group underwent implantation of autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix following core decompression procedure; allogeneic bone support frame group underwent implantation of allogeneic bone support frame, autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix following core decompression procedure. In addition, 23 patients were treated by implantation of allogeneic bone support frame, autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix. Main Outcombe Measures: Imageology, histological examinations and biomechanic testing were performed in the animals at 5, 10, and 20 weeks after implantation. In addition, the changes of Harris hip scores and the progression in radiographic stages of patients before and after surgery were observed. Results: Histological and imageological examinations revealed that the bone defect repair and bone formation in allogeneic bone support frame group were better than autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix group, and the two groups were significantly better than core decompression alone group (P < 0.05). The biomechanics test showed the biomechanical properties of the femoral head in allogeneic bone support frame group were significantly superior over the other two groups (P < 0.05). All patients were followed up for more than 18 months. The preoperative excellent rate of Harris scores was 43.5%, and that of postoperative score was 91.3%. The recent follow-up showed that 22 hips were radiologically stable. No major complications occurred. Conclusion: Implanting a composite of allogeneic bone support frame, autologous bone and decalcified bone matrix can enhance biomechanical properties of the femoral heads, promote osteonecrotic bone repair and prevent collapse.