Comparison of Non-contact Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Measurements in Non-pathologic High Myopia
Peiyuan Wang,Yunhe Song,Fengbin Lin,Zhenyu Wang,Xinbo Gao,Weijing Cheng,Meiling Chen,Yuying Peng,Yuhong Liu,Xiulan Zhang,Shida Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.819715
IF: 3.9
2022-03-03
Frontiers in Medicine
Abstract:Purpose To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) values obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP GAT ) and non-contact tonometry (IOP NCT ) in a non-pathologic high myopia population. Methods A total of 720 eyes from 720 Chinese adults with non-pathologic high myopia were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Demographic and ocular characteristics, including axial length, refractive error, central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal curvature (CC) were recorded. Each patient was successively treated with IOP NCT and IOP GAT . Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to detect factors associated with IOP NCT and IOP GAT , as well as the measurement difference between the two devices (IOP NCT−GAT ). Results In this non-pathologic high myopia population, the mean IOP NCT and IOP GAT values were 17.60 ± 2.76 mmHg and 13.85 ± 2.43 mmHg, respectively. The IOP measurements of the two devices were significantly correlated ( r = 0.681, P < 0.001), however, IOP NCT overestimated IOP GAT with a mean difference of 3.75 mmHg (95% confidence interval: 3.60–3.91 mmHg). In multivariate regression, IOP NCT was significantly associated with body mass index (standardized β = 0.075, p = 0.033), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (standardized β = 0.170, p < 0.001), and CCT (standardized β = 0.526, p < 0.001). As for IOP GAT , only SBP (standardized β = 0.162, p < 0.001), CCT (standardized β = 0.259, p < 0.001), and CC (standardized β = 0.156, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated. The mean IOP NCT−GAT difference increased with younger age (standardized β = −0.134, p < 0.001), higher body mass index (standardized β = 0.091, p = 0.009), higher SBP (standardized β = 0.074, p = 0.027), thicker CCT (standardized β = 0.506, p < 0.001), and lower IOP GAT (standardized β = −0.409, p < 0.001). Conclusion In the non-pathologic high myopia population, IOP NCT overestimated IOP GAT at 3.75 ± 2.10 mmHg. This study suggests that the difference between the values obtained by the two devices, and their respective influencing factors, should be considered in the clinical evaluation and management of highly myopic populations.
medicine, general & internal